[#70977] [Ruby trunk - Feature #11473] Immutable String literal in Ruby 3 — arai@...
Issue #11473 has been updated by Shunichi Arai.
3 messages
2015/10/04
[#70982] limiting scope of magic comments like frozen_string_literal — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
How about being able to limit the scope of magic comments like
4 messages
2015/10/05
[#71062] [Ruby trunk - Bug #10892] Deadlock in autoload — eregontp@...
Issue #10892 has been updated by Benoit Daloze.
4 messages
2015/10/12
[#71090] Re: [Ruby trunk - Bug #10892] Deadlock in autoload
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2015/10/14
eregontp@gmail.com wrote:
[#71127] [Ruby trunk - Feature #11607] [PATCH] fiddle: release GVL for ffi_call — normalperson@...
Issue #11607 has been updated by Eric Wong.
3 messages
2015/10/20
[#71164] [Ruby trunk - Feature #11614] [Open] [RFC] use id_table for constant tables — normalperson@...
Issue #11614 has been reported by Eric Wong.
3 messages
2015/10/22
[#71211] [Ruby trunk - Feature #11607] [PATCH] fiddle: release GVL for ffi_call — naruse@...
Issue #11607 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.
6 messages
2015/10/27
[#71212] Re: [Ruby trunk - Feature #11607] [PATCH] fiddle: release GVL for ffi_call
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2015/10/27
Yes, user must check if the function is MT-safe. Probably fine
[#71246] Re: [Ruby trunk - Feature #11607] [PATCH] fiddle: release GVL for ffi_call
— Aaron Patterson <tenderlove@...>
2015/10/28
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 08:54:07AM +0000, Eric Wong wrote:
[#71254] Re: [Ruby trunk - Feature #11607] [PATCH] fiddle: release GVL for ffi_call
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2015/10/28
Aaron Patterson <tenderlove@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#71230] [Ruby trunk - Feature #11625] Unlock GVL for SHA1 calculations — tenderlove@...
Issue #11625 has been updated by Aaron Patterson.
5 messages
2015/10/27
[#71236] Re: [Ruby trunk - Feature #11625] Unlock GVL for SHA1 calculations
— Юрий Соколов <funny.falcon@...>
2015/10/28
What's about other hashsum algos? MD5, SHA2, etc
[#71242] Re: [Ruby trunk - Feature #11625] Unlock GVL for SHA1 calculations
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2015/10/28
Юрий Соколов <funny.falcon@gmail.com> wrote:
[#71239] [Ruby trunk - Bug #11384] multi-threaded autoload sometimes fails — shugo@...
Issue #11384 has been updated by Shugo Maeda.
4 messages
2015/10/28
[ruby-core:71190] [Ruby trunk - Feature #11537] Introduce "Safe navigation operator"
From:
rr.rosas@...
Date:
2015-10-26 13:58:58 UTC
List:
ruby-core #71190
Issue #11537 has been updated by Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas. Yehuda Katz wrote: > As shorthand for: > > ~~~ > u && u.profile && u.profile.thumbnails && u.profile.thumbnails.large > ~~~ Actually, it would be a shorthand for something like: ~~~ u && (tmp1 = u.profile) && (tmp2 = tmp1.thumbnails) && tmp2.large ~~~ But I still prefer the syntax implemented in trunk as it's similar to other languages and will be more familiar for those used to the operator in Groovy and CoffeeScript, for example. ---------------------------------------- Feature #11537: Introduce "Safe navigation operator" https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/11537#change-54569 * Author: Hiroshi SHIBATA * Status: Closed * Priority: Normal * Assignee: Yukihiro Matsumoto ---------------------------------------- I sometimes write following code with rails application: ```ruby u = User.find(id) if u && u.profile && u.profile.thumbnails && u.profiles.thumbnails.large ... ``` or ```ruby # Use ActiveSupport if u.try!(:profile).try!(:thumbnails).try!(:large) ... ``` I hope to write shortly above code. Groovy has above operator named "Safe navigation operator" with "`?.`" syntax. Ruby can't use "`?.`" operator. Can we use "`.?`" syntax. like this: ```ruby u = User.find(id) u.?profile.?thumbnails.?large ``` Matz. How do you think about this? -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/