[#57574] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8976][Open] file-scope freeze_string directive — "akr (Akira Tanaka)" <akr@...>
70 messages
2013/10/02
[#57579] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8977][Open] String#frozen that takes advantage of the deduping — "sam.saffron (Sam Saffron)" <sam.saffron@...>
25 messages
2013/10/02
[#57633] [ruby-trunk - Bug #8983][Open] [PATCH] GC.stat[:heap_free_num] returns number of unused slots on heap — "tmm1 (Aman Gupta)" <ruby@...1.net>
8 messages
2013/10/03
[#57667] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8985][Open] xwillfree - promise to free memory — "funny_falcon (Yura Sokolov)" <funny.falcon@...>
5 messages
2013/10/04
[#57679] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8987][Open] map/collect extension which handles arguments — "sowieso (So Wieso)" <sowieso@...>
16 messages
2013/10/05
[#57680] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8987] map/collect extension which handles arguments
— "sawa (Tsuyoshi Sawada)" <sawadatsuyoshi@...>
2013/10/05
[#57693] [PATCH 0/2] Fix strptime '%s' — Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@...>
Hi,
7 messages
2013/10/07
[#57694] [PATCH 1/2] time: fix strptime '%s'
— Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@...>
2013/10/07
'%s' is meant to imply UTC, however:
[#57703] Re: [PATCH 1/2] time: fix strptime '%s'
— Tanaka Akira <akr@...>
2013/10/07
2013/10/7 Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>:
[#57711] Re: [PATCH 1/2] time: fix strptime '%s'
— Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@...>
2013/10/07
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 10:17 AM, Tanaka Akira <akr@fsij.org> wrote:
[#57705] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8992][Open] Use String#freeze and compiler tricks to replace "str"f suffix — "headius (Charles Nutter)" <headius@...>
43 messages
2013/10/07
[#57840] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8992] Use String#freeze and compiler tricks to replace "str"f suffix
— "sam.saffron (Sam Saffron)" <sam.saffron@...>
2013/10/13
[#57727] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8998][Open] string keys for hash literals should use fstrings — "normalperson (Eric Wong)" <normalperson@...>
17 messages
2013/10/08
[#57743] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8998] string keys for hash literals should use fstrings
— "normalperson (Eric Wong)" <normalperson@...>
2013/10/08
[#57756] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #8998] string keys for hash literals should use fstrings
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2013/10/09
I think my failed patch exposes a bug with lazy sweep + rb_fstring.
[#57771] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9008][Open] TestProcess#test_clock_getres_constants and TestProcess#test_clock_gettime_constants fails on ARM — "vo.x (Vit Ondruch)" <v.ondruch@...>
15 messages
2013/10/09
[#57852] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9008] TestProcess#test_clock_getres_constants and TestProcess#test_clock_gettime_constants fails on ARM
— "kosaki (Motohiro KOSAKI)" <kosaki.motohiro@...>
2013/10/14
[#57884] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9008] TestProcess#test_clock_getres_constants and TestProcess#test_clock_gettime_constants fails on ARM
— "kosaki (Motohiro KOSAKI)" <kosaki.motohiro@...>
2013/10/15
[#57794] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9011][Open] rb_fstring unsafe to use in general case — "normalperson (Eric Wong)" <normalperson@...>
4 messages
2013/10/10
[#57812] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9013][Open] Crash on start — "lemonez (Dmitry Popov)" <lemon@...>
6 messages
2013/10/10
[#57849] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9020][Open] Net::HTTPResponse predicate/query methods — "timcraft (Tim Craft)" <redmine@...>
7 messages
2013/10/14
[#57862] [CommonRuby - Feature #9023][Open] Array#tail — "fuadksd (Fuad Saud)" <fuadksd@...>
9 messages
2013/10/15
[#57888] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9025][Open] Clarify the error message when calling a method with the wrong number of arguments — Nerian (Gonzalo Rodríguez) <siotopo@...>
11 messages
2013/10/15
[#57913] cxxflags for C++ library bindings not working for Ruby 1.9.x and 2.0? — Stefan Salewski <mail@...>
Dear Sirs,
4 messages
2013/10/17
[#57916] Re: cxxflags for C++ library bindings not working for Ruby 1.9.x and 2.0?
— Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
2013/10/17
(13/10/17 22:03), Stefan Salewski wrote:
[#57950] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9039][Open] [PATCH] socket: avoid unnecessary ppoll/select on Linux (part 3) — "normalperson (Eric Wong)" <normalperson@...>
8 messages
2013/10/21
[#57951] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9040][Open] Readline duplicate file descriptors but doesn't close them — "eweb (Eamonn Webster)" <eamonn.webster@...>
8 messages
2013/10/21
[#57986] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9040] Readline duplicate file descriptors but doesn't close them
— "akr (Akira Tanaka)" <akr@...>
2013/10/23
[#57967] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9043][Open] Add String#f method as shortcut for #freeze — "headius (Charles Nutter)" <headius@...>
8 messages
2013/10/22
[#58007] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9049][Open] Shorthands (a:b, *) for inclusive indexing — "mohawkjohn (John Woods)" <john.o.woods@...>
25 messages
2013/10/24
[#58011] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9049] Shorthands (a:b, *) for inclusive indexing
— "boris_stitnicky (Boris Stitnicky)" <boris@...>
2013/10/24
[#58012] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #9049] Shorthands (a:b, *) for inclusive indexing
— David MacMahon <davidm@...>
2013/10/24
[#58013] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #9049] Shorthands (a:b, *) for inclusive indexing
— Fuad Saud <fuadksd@...>
2013/10/24
How is a:b better than a..b? two dots are straightforward, unambiguous, well known.
[#58080] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9064][Open] Add support for packages, like in Java — "rosenfeld (Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas)" <rr.rosas@...>
23 messages
2013/10/30
[#58083] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9064] Add support for packages, like in Java
— "rosenfeld (Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas)" <rr.rosas@...>
2013/10/30
[#58114] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9068][Open] [PATCH (trivial)] thread.c: reduce rb_mutex_t size by 8 bytes on x86_64 — "normalperson (Eric Wong)" <normalperson@...>
5 messages
2013/10/31
[#58115] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #9068][Open] [PATCH (trivial)] thread.c: reduce rb_mutex_t size by 8 bytes on x86_64
— KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...>
2013/10/31
(10/31/13 3:42 PM), normalperson (Eric Wong) wrote:
[#58116] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #9068][Open] [PATCH (trivial)] thread.c: reduce rb_mutex_t size by 8 bytes on x86_64
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2013/10/31
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com> wrote:
[ruby-core:57931] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9035] [proposal] new RUBY_GC_HEAP_GROWTH_MAX_OBJ tuning parameter
From:
"nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada)" <nobu@...>
Date:
2013-10-18 05:28:15 UTC
List:
ruby-core #57931
Issue #9035 has been updated by nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada).
Description updated
----------------------------------------
Bug #9035: [proposal] new RUBY_GC_HEAP_GROWTH_MAX_OBJ tuning parameter
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/9035#change-42514
Author: tmm1 (Aman Gupta)
Status: Open
Priority: Normal
Assignee: ko1 (Koichi Sasada)
Category: core
Target version: current: 2.1.0
ruby -v: ruby 2.1.0dev
Backport: 1.9.3: UNKNOWN, 2.0.0: UNKNOWN
=begin
= Background
Currently, whenever the Ruby GC runs out of object slots the heap is grown by 1.8x (((%GC_HEAP_GROWTH_FACTOR%))).
This works well for small programs, but given a large application it will cause rapid increase in memory.
For example, if a ruby program is using 1 million objects and runs out of slots, it will grow to 1.8 million objects.
This is a huge increase.
= Proposal
Introduce ((%RUBY_GC_HEAP_GROWTH_MAX_OBJ%)) to avoid exponential growth in larger ruby applications.
After this limit is reached, heap growth will happen linearly instead of exponentially.
For example, if ((%growth_max=100k%)) then the application above will grow from 1mm objects to 1.1mm objects.
= Discussion
((%RUBY_GC_HEAP_GROWTH_MAX%)) can be represented either in a) bytesize, or b) number of objects.
Arguments for (a)
* more user friendly, since users are exposed primarily to RSS and want to control final RSS value
* a bytesize based formula can include more varibles, for example the size of bitmaps associated with each (({RVALUE}))
Arguments for (b)
* consistent with existing tuning parameters (all object based, i.e. RUBY_HEAP_MIN_SLOTS)
* GC tuning already requires measuring "startup objects", "objects per request", so object based is more friendly
* bytesize is confusing because ((%GROWTH_MAX%)) only controls growth of ruby heap, not total RSS
* this is an advanced feature meant for use by experts (default value will be 0 = no change from behavior)
since experts will be using it, we can assume they have already measured the number of objects in their ruby app first
=end
--
http://bugs.ruby-lang.org/