[#51834] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7780][Open] Marshal & YAML should deserialize only basic types by default. — "marcandre (Marc-Andre Lafortune)" <ruby-core@...>
19 messages
2013/02/04
[#51838] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7780] Marshal & YAML should deserialize only basic types by default.
— "marcandre (Marc-Andre Lafortune)" <ruby-core@...>
2013/02/04
[#51886] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7780] Marshal & YAML should deserialize only basic types by default.
— "marcandre (Marc-Andre Lafortune)" <ruby-core@...>
2013/02/05
[#51864] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7784][Open] [mingw] r39055 creates test failures and functionality loss — "jonforums (Jon Forums)" <redmine@...>
7 messages
2013/02/05
[#51870] [Backport93 - Backport #7786][Assigned] fix for abstract namespace — "shugo (Shugo Maeda)" <redmine@...>
7 messages
2013/02/05
[#51897] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7791][Open] Let symbols be garbage collected — "rosenfeld (Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas)" <rr.rosas@...>
64 messages
2013/02/06
[#51899] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7791][Feedback] Let symbols be garbage collected
— "shyouhei (Shyouhei Urabe)" <shyouhei@...>
2013/02/06
[#51909] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #7791][Feedback] Let symbols be garbage collected
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2013/02/06
(2013/02/06 22:50), shyouhei (Shyouhei Urabe) wrote:
[#51961] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #7791][Feedback] Let symbols be garbage collected
— "Martin J. Dürst" <duerst@...>
2013/02/07
A slightly different idea, closer to the existing garbage collection:
[#51978] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #7791][Feedback] Let symbols be garbage collected
— Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...>
2013/02/07
I think Koichi's approach is a better one. I don't think there are any
[#51983] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #7791][Feedback] Let symbols be garbage collected
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2013/02/07
(2013/02/07 20:25), Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas wrote:
[#51927] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #7791][Open] Let symbols be garbage collected
— Nikolai Weibull <now@...>
2013/02/06
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 2:37 PM, rosenfeld (Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas)
[#51898] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7792][Open] Make symbols and strings the same thing — "rosenfeld (Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas)" <rr.rosas@...>
86 messages
2013/02/06
[#51993] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7792] Make symbols and strings the same thing
— "jeremyevans0 (Jeremy Evans)" <merch-redmine@...>
2013/02/07
[#52006] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #7792] Make symbols and strings the same thing
— Matthew Kerwin <matthew@...>
2013/02/07
On 8 February 2013 03:01, jeremyevans0 (Jeremy Evans) <
[#52009] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #7792] Make symbols and strings the same thing
— Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...>
2013/02/07
Em 07-02-2013 19:15, Matthew Kerwin escreveu:
[#52016] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #7792] Make symbols and strings the same thing
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2013/02/07
Hi,
[#52017] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #7792] Make symbols and strings the same thing
— Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...>
2013/02/08
Em 07-02-2013 21:58, Yukihiro Matsumoto escreveu:
[#51914] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7792] Make symbols and strings the same thing
— "rosenfeld (Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas)" <rr.rosas@...>
2013/02/06
[#51916] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #7792] Make symbols and strings the same thing
— Yorick Peterse <yorickpeterse@...>
2013/02/06
You don't need to hijack any code for it, you'd just use it as
[#51920] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #7792] Make symbols and strings the same thing
— Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...>
2013/02/06
Em 06-02-2013 12:36, Yorick Peterse escreveu:
[#51926] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #7792] Make symbols and strings the same thing
— Yorick Peterse <yorickpeterse@...>
2013/02/06
I don't think I'm following you, can you explain what's supposedly
[#51936] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #7792] Make symbols and strings the same thing
— Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...>
2013/02/06
Em 06-02-2013 13:25, Yorick Peterse escreveu:
[#51940] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #7792] Make symbols and strings the same thing
— Yorick Peterse <yorickpeterse@...>
2013/02/06
> What I'm trying to say is that the main reason why symbols exist in
[#51941] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #7792] Make symbols and strings the same thing
— Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...>
2013/02/06
Em 06-02-2013 16:22, Yorick Peterse escreveu:
[#51943] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #7792] Make symbols and strings the same thing
— Yorick Peterse <yorickpeterse@...>
2013/02/06
> And "growing until you hit your memory limit" is actually only valid
[#51972] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7792] Make symbols and strings the same thing
— "rosenfeld (Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas)" <rr.rosas@...>
2013/02/07
[#51979] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #7792] Make symbols and strings the same thing
— Matthew Kerwin <matthew@...>
2013/02/07
On 7 February 2013 20:46, rosenfeld (Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas) wrote:
[#51981] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #7792] Make symbols and strings the same thing
— Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...>
2013/02/07
Em 07-02-2013 10:04, Matthew Kerwin escreveu:
[#52005] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #7792] Make symbols and strings the same thing
— Matthew Kerwin <matthew@...>
2013/02/07
On 7 February 2013 23:09, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas wrote:
[#51996] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7792] Make symbols and strings the same thing
— "rosenfeld (Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas)" <rr.rosas@...>
2013/02/07
[#51997] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #7792] Make symbols and strings the same thing
— David MacMahon <davidm@...>
2013/02/07
[#52018] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #7792] Make symbols and strings the same thing
— Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>
2013/02/08
On Feb 7, 2013, at 10:43, David MacMahon <davidm@astro.berkeley.edu> wrote:
[#52020] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #7792] Make symbols and strings the same thing
— David MacMahon <davidm@...>
2013/02/08
[#84467] [Ruby trunk Feature#7792] Make symbols and strings the same thing
— danieldasilvaferreira@...
2017/12/26
Issue #7792 has been updated by dsferreira (Daniel Ferreira).
[#51965] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7795][Open] Symbol.defined? and/or to_existing_symbol — "Student (Nathan Zook)" <blogger@...>
13 messages
2013/02/07
[#51977] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7797][Open] Hash should be renamed to StrictHash and a new Hash should be created to behave like AS HashWithIndifferentAccess — "rosenfeld (Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas)" <rr.rosas@...>
22 messages
2013/02/07
[#51988] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7797] Hash should be renamed to StrictHash and a new Hash should be created to behave like AS HashWithIndifferentAccess
— "rosenfeld (Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas)" <rr.rosas@...>
2013/02/07
[#52042] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7805][Open] ruby 2.0rc2 core on solaris — "groenveld@... (John Groenveld)" <groenveld@...>
23 messages
2013/02/08
[#52048] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7806][Open] inconsistency between Method#inspect and Method#name — "Hanmac (Hans Mackowiak)" <hanmac@...>
4 messages
2013/02/08
[#52073] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7815][Open] Backport: Warning about TracePoint events to 2.0.0 — "zzak (Zachary Scott)" <zachary@...>
9 messages
2013/02/09
[#52075] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7816][Open] Don't invalidate method caches when defining a new method on a class without subclasses — "charliesome (Charlie Somerville)" <charlie@...>
17 messages
2013/02/09
[#52077] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7817][Open] (Unable to compile Ruby 2.0.0-rc2 on OSX (clang version 2.1) — "injekt (Lee Jarvis)" <ljjarvis@...>
10 messages
2013/02/09
[#52087] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7820][Assigned] Let's decide Ruby 2.0 supported platform list — "mame (Yusuke Endoh)" <mame@...>
15 messages
2013/02/10
[#52104] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7820] Let's decide Ruby 2.0 supported platform list
— "mame (Yusuke Endoh)" <mame@...>
2013/02/10
[#52117] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #7820] Let's decide Ruby 2.0 supported platform list
— Vít Ondruch <v.ondruch@...>
2013/02/10
Dne 10.2.2013 13:01, mame (Yusuke Endoh) napsal(a):
[#52130] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7829][Open] Rounding error in Ruby Time — "loirotte (Philippe Dosch)" <loirotte@...>
25 messages
2013/02/11
[#52139] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7829] Rounding error in Ruby Time
— "drbrain (Eric Hodel)" <drbrain@...7.net>
2013/02/12
[#52579] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7829] Rounding error in Ruby Time
— "loirotte (Philippe Dosch)" <loirotte@...>
2013/02/20
[#52586] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #7829] Rounding error in Ruby Time
— David MacMahon <davidm@...>
2013/02/20
[#52667] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #7829] Rounding error in Ruby Time
— David MacMahon <davidm@...>
2013/02/22
[#53961] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #7829] Rounding error in Ruby Time
— Tanaka Akira <akr@...>
2013/04/03
2013/2/22 David MacMahon <davidm@astro.berkeley.edu>:
[#53969] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #7829] Rounding error in Ruby Time
— David MacMahon <davidm@...>
2013/04/03
[#53978] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #7829] Rounding error in Ruby Time
— Tanaka Akira <akr@...>
2013/04/04
2013/4/4 David MacMahon <davidm@astro.berkeley.edu>:
[#54007] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #7829] Rounding error in Ruby Time
— David MacMahon <davidm@...>
2013/04/05
[#54008] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #7829] Rounding error in Ruby Time
— Tanaka Akira <akr@...>
2013/04/05
2013/4/5 David MacMahon <davidm@astro.berkeley.edu>:
[#54033] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #7829] Rounding error in Ruby Time
— David MacMahon <davidm@...>
2013/04/05
[#52131] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7830][Open] Ruby packages should not build with -Werror when distributed — "kremenek (Ted Kremenek)" <kremenek@...>
21 messages
2013/02/11
[#52165] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7839][Open] Symbol.freeze_symbols — "tenderlovemaking (Aaron Patterson)" <aaron@...>
23 messages
2013/02/12
[#52179] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7839] Symbol.freeze_symbols
— "shugo (Shugo Maeda)" <redmine@...>
2013/02/13
[#52206] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7842][Assigned] An alias of a "prepend"ed method skips the original method when calling super — "mame (Yusuke Endoh)" <mame@...>
15 messages
2013/02/13
[#52251] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7842] An alias of a "prepend"ed method skips the original method when calling super
— "nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada)" <nobu@...>
2013/02/14
[#52215] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7845][Open] Strip doesn't handle unicode space characters in ruby 1.9.2 & 1.9.3 (does in 1.9.1) — "timothyg56 (Timothy Garnett)" <timothyg@...>
18 messages
2013/02/13
[#52254] p385 breaks bakward compatibility — V咜 Ondruch <v.ondruch@...>
Hi,
10 messages
2013/02/14
[#52307] Re: p385 breaks bakward compatibility
— Jeremy Evans <code@...>
2013/02/17
On 02/14 06:06, V?t Ondruch wrote:
[#52267] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7854][Open] New method Symbol[string] — "Student (Nathan Zook)" <blogger@...>
22 messages
2013/02/14
[#52371] Broken email notification from Redmine? — =?ISO-8859-2?Q?V=EDt_Ondruch?= <v.ondruch@...>
Hi,
5 messages
2013/02/17
[#52492] Redmine & utf in title bug — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core-mailing-list@...>
I notice a lot of
4 messages
2013/02/18
[#52495] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7879][Open] File.readable? fails when ruby runs as root — "balbi (Feliple Balbi)" <balbif@...>
5 messages
2013/02/18
[#52508] Should I document refinements in a PickAxe update? — Dave Thomas <dave@...>
Gentle core folk:
6 messages
2013/02/19
[#52512] Re: Should I document refinements in a PickAxe update?
— Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>
2013/02/19
On Feb 18, 2013, at 19:58, Dave Thomas <dave@pragprog.com> wrote:
[#52515] Re: Should I document refinements in a PickAxe update?
— Dave Thomas <dave@...>
2013/02/19
> I think a document in a PickAxe update with appropriate warnings would
[#52605] Re: Should I document refinements in a PickAxe update?
— Shugo Maeda <shugo@...>
2013/02/21
2013/2/19 Dave Thomas <dave@pragprog.com>:
[#52581] Fwd: Fixnum: freeze status on ruby 2.0.0 rc2 — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>
3 messages
2013/02/20
[#52596] [CommonRuby - Feature #7895][Open] Exception#backtrace_locations to go with Thread#backtrace_locations and Kernel#caller_locations — "headius (Charles Nutter)" <headius@...>
18 messages
2013/02/20
[#52598] Re: [CommonRuby - Feature #7895][Open] Exception#backtrace_locations to go with Thread#backtrace_locations and Kernel#caller_locations
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2013/02/20
(2013/02/21 6:02), headius (Charles Nutter) wrote:
[#52600] Re: [CommonRuby - Feature #7895][Open] Exception#backtrace_locations to go with Thread#backtrace_locations and Kernel#caller_locations
— Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...>
2013/02/20
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 8:36 AM, SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
[#52701] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7914][Open] Case for local class methods — "trans (Thomas Sawyer)" <transfire@...>
8 messages
2013/02/22
[#52704] Feature Request w/ Patch: CSV::Row, adds ".each_pair" as an alias for ".each" — Ryan Dowell <ssstarduster@...>
A very simple patch. Adds ".each_pair" as an alias to ".each" in
3 messages
2013/02/22
[#52722] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7917][Open] Can't write to a Logger in a signal handler — "mperham (Mike Perham)" <mperham@...>
9 messages
2013/02/23
[#52732] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #7917][Open] Can't write to a Logger in a signal handler
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2013/02/23
"mperham (Mike Perham)" <mperham@gmail.com> wrote:
[#52723] Improving order of NEWS — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core-mailing-list@...>
I feel the NEWS are in the wrong order: C API, builtin classes, std-lib,
5 messages
2013/02/23
[#52727] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7918][Open] Create Signal.in_trap?() — "kosaki (Motohiro KOSAKI)" <kosaki.motohiro@...>
10 messages
2013/02/23
[#52842] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #7918][Open] Create Signal.in_trap?()
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2013/02/24
(2013/02/23 11:31), kosaki (Motohiro KOSAKI) wrote:
[#52737] What's the *right* way to build Ruby from source on a Linux system that doesn't yet have Ruby? — Paul Sherwood <paul.sherwood@...>
We'd like to add Ruby support in a clean Linux environment which has
6 messages
2013/02/23
[#52738] Re: What's the *right* way to build Ruby from source on a Linux system that doesn't yet have Ruby?
— Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>
2013/02/23
On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 9:38 AM, Paul Sherwood
[#52745] Re: What's the *right* way to build Ruby from source on a Linux system that doesn't yet have Ruby?
— Paul Sherwood <paul.sherwood@...>
2013/02/23
On 23/02/2013 13:16, Luis Lavena wrote:
[#52748] Re: What's the *right* way to build Ruby from source on a Linux system that doesn't yet have Ruby?
— Paul Sherwood <paul.sherwood@...>
2013/02/23
> On 23/02/2013 13:16, Luis Lavena wrote:
[#52876] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7957][Open] rb_str_modify() does not prevent shared string from rb_str_set_len() — "normalperson (Eric Wong)" <normalperson@...>
6 messages
2013/02/25
[#52877] Any documentation about debugging in Ruby 2.0.0 — Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...>
Hi, I couldn't find how to debug Ruby 2.0.0 programs, but only a few
14 messages
2013/02/25
[#52880] Re: Any documentation about debugging in Ruby 2.0.0
— Jeremy Kemper <jeremy@...>
2013/02/25
On Monday, February 25, 2013, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas wrote:
[#52883] Re: Any documentation about debugging in Ruby 2.0.0
— Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...>
2013/02/25
Em 25-02-2013 10:47, Jeremy Kemper escreveu:
[#52886] Re: Any documentation about debugging in Ruby 2.0.0
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2013/02/25
(2013/02/26 0:22), Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas wrote:
[#52948] Re: Any documentation about debugging in Ruby 2.0.0
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2013/02/26
(2013/02/26 2:34), SASADA Koichi wrote:
[#52952] Re: Any documentation about debugging in Ruby 2.0.0
— Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...>
2013/02/26
Em 26-02-2013 15:14, SASADA Koichi escreveu:
[#52954] Re: Any documentation about debugging in Ruby 2.0.0
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2013/02/26
(2013/02/27 4:19), Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas wrote:
[#52957] Re: Any documentation about debugging in Ruby 2.0.0
— Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...>
2013/02/26
Em 26-02-2013 17:23, SASADA Koichi escreveu:
[#53369] Re: Any documentation about debugging in Ruby 2.0.0
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2013/03/13
I rewrite a debugger for Ruby 2.0.
[#53381] Re: Any documentation about debugging in Ruby 2.0.0
— Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...>
2013/03/13
Thank you very much, Koichi, but I couldn't get it to work yet:
[#52997] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7978][Open] boolean to_i — "alexeymuranov (Alexey Muranov)" <redmine@...>
14 messages
2013/02/27
[#53017] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7982][Open] rb_raise segfaults on %lli format with (0xffffffff + 1) — "erik.s.chang (Erik Chang)" <erik.s.chang@...>
10 messages
2013/02/28
[#53035] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7986][Open] Custom case statement comparison method — "trans (Thomas Sawyer)" <transfire@...>
7 messages
2013/02/28
[ruby-core:52103] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #7820] Let's decide Ruby 2.0 supported platform list
From:
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...>
Date:
2013-02-10 09:57:43 UTC
List:
ruby-core #52103
On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 8:11 PM, jonforums (Jon Forums) <redmine@ruby-lang.org> wrote: > > Issue #7820 has been updated by jonforums (Jon Forums). > > > A great idea to simplify and clarify! > > Perhaps listing support tiers instead of "well-cared" and "maintained"? > > * Tier 1: the platform has a public CI (normally green) and is maintained by a ruby-core committer > * Tier 2: the platform is maintained by a ruby-core committer I like a name of tier[12]. > * 3rd Party: best-effort support by members of the ruby community (e.g. - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Ruby_SIG) > > Note that the 3rd Party tier is an opportunity for commercial and non-commercial parties to get a form of (non-endorsed) advertisement. > > While it should be self evident that just because a platform (e.g. Arch Linux) is not listed in any support tier doesn't mean MRI won't build/test/install on that platform, consider adding something much shorter than the sentence you just finished. Essentially, "try it, and if it breaks let us know." In this case, 3rd party want to use their own bug tracker. thus, I don't want to put misleading advertise. As far as our community don't have any maintainer nor developer, we have to keep silence. I'm afraid unnecessary advertise bring them harmful. > Consider dropping the OS version as it's misleading and often out-of-date. For example, listing "Ubuntu 10.04 64bit" can be misinterpreted as meaning ruby-core is only supporting an outdated OS version. I know this to be false as I regularly test on Ubuntu 12.10 32bit and 64bit. > > Instead of listing mingw, mswin32, mswin64 consider: > > * Tier 1: > * Windows 7/8 32/64bit (nobu) > > * Tier 2: > * Windows 7/8 32/64bit (usa) > > Yes, I'm in favor of dropping "official" support for XP and ready to dodge the arrows for advocating for it ;) Hm. this is interesting and debatable idea. I have an another idea. * Tier 1: * Ubuntu 10.04 64-bit * Tier 2: * Ubuntu >10.04 64-bit The background theory is, tier1 must have CI. then tier have to have version number. "maybe work" should be categorized tier 2.