[#46049] [ruby-trunk - Feature #6590] Dealing with bigdecimal, etc gems in JRuby — "mrkn (Kenta Murata)" <muraken@...>
4 messages
2012/07/01
[#46078] [ruby-trunk - Feature #2565] adding hooks for better tracing — "mame (Yusuke Endoh)" <mame@...>
4 messages
2012/07/01
[#46108] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #2565] adding hooks for better tracing
— Aaron Patterson <tenderlove@...>
2012/07/02
On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 03:06:59AM +0900, mame (Yusuke Endoh) wrote:
[#46127] [ruby-trunk - Feature #2565] adding hooks for better tracing — "vo.x (Vit Ondruch)" <v.ondruch@...>
4 messages
2012/07/03
[#46160] [ruby-trunk - Feature #6693][Open] Don't warn for unused variables starting with _ — "marcandre (Marc-Andre Lafortune)" <ruby-core@...>
15 messages
2012/07/04
[#46163] [ruby-trunk - Feature #6695][Open] Configuration for Thread/Fiber creation — "ko1 (Koichi Sasada)" <redmine@...>
7 messages
2012/07/04
[#46172] [ruby-trunk - Feature #6697][Open] [PATCH] Add Kernel#Symbol conversion method like String(), Array() etc. — "madeofcode (Mark Dodwell)" <mark@...>
7 messages
2012/07/04
[#46236] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6704][Open] Random core dump — "trans (Thomas Sawyer)" <transfire@...>
7 messages
2012/07/07
[#46248] building ruby-1.9.3-p194 on AIX 6.1 TL05 SP06 — Perry Smith <pedzsan@...>
I am just now starting to debug this but hoped someone has already blazed this trail.
10 messages
2012/07/08
[#46251] Re: building ruby-1.9.3-p194 on AIX 6.1 TL05 SP06
— Yutaka Kanemoto <kinpoco@...>
2012/07/08
Hi Perry
[#46252] Re: building ruby-1.9.3-p194 on AIX 6.1 TL05 SP06
— Perry Smith <pedzsan@...>
2012/07/08
[#46254] Re: building ruby-1.9.3-p194 on AIX 6.1 TL05 SP06
— Perry Smith <pedzsan@...>
2012/07/08
[#46259] Re: building ruby-1.9.3-p194 on AIX 6.1 TL05 SP06
— Perry Smith <pedzsan@...>
2012/07/09
[#46266] Re: building ruby-1.9.3-p194 on AIX 6.1 TL05 SP06
— Yutaka Kanemoto <kinpoco@...>
2012/07/09
Hi Perry,
[#46276] Lambdaification of Method Calls — Robert Klemme <shortcutter@...>
Hi,
3 messages
2012/07/09
[#46320] [ruby-trunk - Feature #6721][Open] Object#yield_self — "alexeymuranov (Alexey Muranov)" <redmine@...>
25 messages
2012/07/11
[#46339] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6724][Open] waaaaaaant! ( — "zenspider (Ryan Davis)" <redmine@...>
11 messages
2012/07/11
[#46537] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #6724][Open] waaaaaaant! (
— Aaron Patterson <tenderlove@...>
2012/07/17
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 08:58:36AM +0900, zenspider (Ryan Davis) wrote:
[#46540] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #6724][Open] waaaaaaant! (
— Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>
2012/07/18
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 6:27 PM, Aaron Patterson
[#46377] [ruby-trunk - Feature #6727][Open] Add Array#rest (with implementation) — "duckinator (Nick Markwell)" <nick@...>
25 messages
2012/07/13
[#46420] [ruby-trunk - Feature #6731][Open] add new method "Object.present?" as a counter to #empty? — "rogerdpack (Roger Pack)" <rogerpack2005@...>
4 messages
2012/07/14
[#46500] [ruby-trunk - Feature #6739][Open] One-line rescue statement should support specifying an exception class — Quintus (Marvin Gülker) <sutniuq@...>
22 messages
2012/07/15
[#46535] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6749][Open] rdoc of Time class (incorrect explanation of leap seconds) — "stomar (Marcus Stollsteimer)" <redmine@...>
7 messages
2012/07/17
[#46687] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6749] rdoc of Time class (incorrect explanation of leap seconds)
— "drbrain (Eric Hodel)" <drbrain@...7.net>
2012/07/23
[#46713] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #6749] rdoc of Time class (incorrect explanation of leap seconds)
— sto.mar@...
2012/07/24
Hi Eric,
[#46734] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #6749] rdoc of Time class (incorrect explanation of leap seconds)
— Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>
2012/07/24
On Jul 23, 2012, at 11:52 PM, sto.mar@web.de wrote:
[#46763] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #6749] rdoc of Time class (incorrect explanation of leap seconds)
— sto.mar@...
2012/07/25
Am 24.07.2012 19:44, schrieb Eric Hodel:
[#46546] Fwd: [ruby-cvs:43609] ko1:r36433 (trunk): * thread.c (rb_thread_call_without_gvl2): added. — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
Hi,
4 messages
2012/07/18
[#46547] Re: Fwd: [ruby-cvs:43609] ko1:r36433 (trunk): * thread.c (rb_thread_call_without_gvl2): added.
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2012/07/18
SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
[#46553] [ruby-trunk - Feature #2565] adding hooks for better tracing — "tenderlovemaking (Aaron Patterson)" <aaron@...>
4 messages
2012/07/18
[#46564] Ruby under CI - Windows — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>
Hello,
6 messages
2012/07/20
[#46574] [ruby-trunk - Feature #6762][Open] Control interrupt timing — "ko1 (Koichi Sasada)" <redmine@...>
39 messages
2012/07/20
[#46575] [ruby-trunk - Feature #6762] Control interrupt timing
— "ko1 (Koichi Sasada)" <redmine@...>
2012/07/20
[#46576] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #6762] Control interrupt timing
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2012/07/20
"ko1 (Koichi Sasada)" <redmine@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#48390] [ruby-trunk - Feature #6762] Control interrupt timing
— "ko1 (Koichi Sasada)" <redmine@...>
2012/10/26
[#50542] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #6762][Open] Control interrupt timing
— Brent Roman <brent@...>
2012/12/03
I was suggesting "interruptible" as a better alternative for
[#46577] [ruby-trunk - Feature #6763][Open] Introduce Flonum technique to speedup floating computation on th 64bit environment — "ko1 (Koichi Sasada)" <redmine@...>
7 messages
2012/07/20
[#46586] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6764][Open] IO#read(size, buf) causes can't set length of shared string in trunk (2.0.0dev) — "nahi (Hiroshi Nakamura)" <nakahiro@...>
4 messages
2012/07/21
[#46641] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6780][Open] cannot compile zlib module, when cross-compiling. — "jinleileiking (lei king)" <jinleileiking@...>
14 messages
2012/07/23
[#46686] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6784][Open] Test failures related to numeric with x64 mingw — "h.shirosaki (Hiroshi Shirosaki)" <h.shirosaki@...>
5 messages
2012/07/23
[#46741] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6789][Open] parse.y compilation error due not updated id.h — "luislavena (Luis Lavena)" <luislavena@...>
8 messages
2012/07/24
[#46742] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6789][Assigned] parse.y compilation error due not updated id.h
— "luislavena (Luis Lavena)" <luislavena@...>
2012/07/24
[#46744] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6791][Open] ext/js on/generator/generator.c fails to compile on nightly build (AIX 6.1) — "pedz (Perry Smith)" <pedz@...>
4 messages
2012/07/25
[#46752] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #6791][Open] ext/js on/generator/generator.c fails to compile on nightly build (AIX 6.1)
— Yutaka Kanemoto <kinpoco@...>
2012/07/25
Hi Perry,
[#46772] Ruby 1.9.3 release? — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...>
JRuby will soon release 1.7.0pre2, the second preview of 1.7. Perhaps
6 messages
2012/07/25
[#46847] Re: Ruby 1.9.3 release?
— "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...>
2012/07/29
(2012/07/26 7:07), Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
[#46864] Re: Ruby 1.9.3 release?
— Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>
2012/07/29
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 10:59 PM, NARUSE, Yui <naruse@airemix.jp> wrote:
[#46792] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6799][Open] Digest::*.hexdigest returns an ASCII-8BIT String — "Eregon (Benoit Daloze)" <redmine@...>
11 messages
2012/07/26
[#46832] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6807][Open] Can't compile ruby without ruby — "devcurmudgeon (Paul Sherwood)" <storitel@...>
13 messages
2012/07/28
[#46834] [ruby-trunk - Feature #6808][Open] Implicit index for enumerations — "trans (Thomas Sawyer)" <transfire@...>
15 messages
2012/07/28
[#46838] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6810][Open] `module A::B; end` is not equivalent to `module A; module B; end; end` with respect to constant lookup (scope) — "alexeymuranov (Alexey Muranov)" <redmine@...>
17 messages
2012/07/28
[#46854] [ruby-trunk - Feature #6811][Open] File, Dir and FileUtils should have bang-versions of singleton methods that fails silently — "prijutme4ty (Ilya Vorontsov)" <prijutme4ty@...>
7 messages
2012/07/29
[#46896] (Half-baked DRAFT) new `require' framework — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
Hi,
22 messages
2012/07/31
[#46897] Re: (Half-baked DRAFT) new `require' framework
— =?KOI8-R?B?4NLJyiDzz8vPzM/X?= <funny.falcon@...>
2012/07/31
2012/7/31 SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net>
[#46899] Re: (Half-baked DRAFT) new `require' framework
— Alex Young <alex@...>
2012/07/31
On 31/07/12 13:29, SASADA Koichi wrote:
[#46902] Re: (Half-baked DRAFT) new `require' framework
— Trans <transfire@...>
2012/07/31
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 12:07 PM, Alex Young <alex@blackkettle.org> wrote:
[#46903] Re: (Half-baked DRAFT) new `require' framework
— Clifford Heath <clifford.heath@...>
2012/07/31
On 01/08/2012, at 5:59 AM, Trans wrote:
[#47040] Re: (Half-baked DRAFT) new `require' framework
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2012/08/07
(2012/07/31 21:29), SASADA Koichi wrote:
[#47054] Re: (Half-baked DRAFT) new `require' framework
— Rocky Bernstein <rockyb@...>
2012/08/07
If one is considering importing archive files like zip, tar, jar, or gem, I
[#47056] Re: (Half-baked DRAFT) new `require' framework
— Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...>
2012/08/07
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 8:48 AM, Rocky Bernstein <rockyb@rubyforge.org> wrote:
[ruby-core:46840] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6810] `module A::B; end` is not equivalent to `module A; module B; end; end` with respect to constant lookup (scope)
From:
"alexeymuranov (Alexey Muranov)" <redmine@...>
Date:
2012-07-28 19:24:48 UTC
List:
ruby-core #46840
Issue #6810 has been updated by alexeymuranov (Alexey Muranov).
fxn (Xavier Noria) wrote:
> Yes, this is expected.
>
> The resolution algorithm first checks the modules in the nesting (in their very constants table, it ignores their ancestors), then the ancestors of the module the constants appears in (the first one in the nesting, or Object if the nesting is empty), and if the former is a module, then Object is checked by hand (and it still tries const_missing if all fails).
>
> The key to understand those examples, in addition to the algorithm, is to be aware of the respective nestings:
>
> module A
> module B
> Module.nesting # => [A::B, A]
> end
> end
>
> whereas
>
> module A::B
> Module.nesting # => [A::B]
> end
>
> In the second case A is not checked, since it is not in the nesting, it is not an ancestor of A::B, and it is not Object.
>
> The nesting is only modified by the class and module keywords, and by opening a singleton class with class << object (and some other obscure cases related to string eval'ing). In particular, the nesting inside and outside class methods defined with def self... is the same.
Xavier, thanks for the explanation, i see now why it works this way, so this is not a bug. However, can anybody please explain to me why this is a desired behavior, i mean the way the nesting is calculated? Wouldn't it be easier if
module A; end
module A::B;
# do something
end
was equivalent to
module A
module B
# do something
end
end
?
----------------------------------------
Bug #6810: `module A::B; end` is not equivalent to `module A; module B; end; end` with respect to constant lookup (scope)
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/6810#change-28513
Author: alexeymuranov (Alexey Muranov)
Status: Open
Priority: Normal
Assignee:
Category: core
Target version:
ruby -v: ruby 1.9.3p194 (2012-04-20 revision 35410) [x86_64-darwin10.8.0]
=begin
Is this the expected behavior? To me it is rather surprising:
N = 0
module A
module B
def self.f; N; end
end
N = 1
end
A::B.f # => 1
but
N = 0
module A; end
module A::B
def self.f; N; end
end
module A
N = 1
end
A::B.f # => 0
Even more striking:
module A
module B
def self.f; N; end
end
end
N = 0
A::B.f # => 0
A::N = 1
puts A::B.f # => 1
A::B::N = 2
A::B.f # => 2
but
module A; end
module A::B
def self.f; N; end
end
N = 0
A::B.f # => 0
A::N = 1
A::B.f # => 0
A::B::N = 2
A::B.f # => 2
=end
--
http://bugs.ruby-lang.org/