[#41916] Proposal: Bitmap Marking GC — Narihiro Nakamura <authornari@...>

Hi.

18 messages 2012/01/05

[#41941] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5851][Open] make check fails when compiling with GCC 4.7 - *** longjmp causes uninitialized stack frame *** — Vit Ondruch <v.ondruch@...>

12 messages 2012/01/06

[#41979] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5865][Open] Exception#== should return false if the classes differ — Hiro Asari <asari.ruby@...>

10 messages 2012/01/08

[#42003] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5871][Open] regexp \W matches some word characters when inside a case-insensitive character class — Gareth Adams <gareth@...>

14 messages 2012/01/09

[#42016] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5873][Open] Adopt FFI over DL — Heesob Park <phasis@...>

15 messages 2012/01/10

[#42149] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5899][Open] chaining comparsions. — Ondrej Bilka <neleai@...>

12 messages 2012/01/16

[#42164] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5903][Open] Optimize st_table (take 2) — Yura Sokolov <funny.falcon@...>

18 messages 2012/01/17

[ruby-core:42156] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #5873] Adopt FFI over DL

From: Aaron Patterson <tenderlove@...>
Date: 2012-01-16 21:33:58 UTC
List: ruby-core #42156
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 12:30:02PM +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> > To remove original DL completely, we have to bundle libffi itself
> > wholly.
> 
> Why?
> 
> Example, openssl is really important and rubygems and some modules
> strongly depend on it. but we don't bundle libopenssl itself. What's
> different?

Also, we don't bundle:

  * zlib
  * libyaml
  * libdbm
  * tk
  * readline (or libedit)
  * libcurses

I don't think we should bundle these, but rubygems depends on some of
them.

-- 
Aaron Patterson
http://tenderlovemaking.com/

In This Thread