[#37708] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4956][Open] [PATCH] string.c (tr_s_bang): fix leak with heap strings — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
5 messages
2011/07/01
[#37807] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4956][Open] [PATCH] string.c (tr_s_bang): fix leak with heap strings
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2011/07/05
Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> wrote:
[#37810] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4956][Open] [PATCH] string.c (tr_s_bang): fix leak with heap strings
— Aaron Patterson <aaron@...>
2011/07/05
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 04:46:44AM +0900, Eric Wong wrote:
[#37714] test fail test/matrix/test_matrix.rb:321 — KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...>
http://59.106.172.211/~chkbuild/ruby-trunk/log/20110701T110101Z.log.html.gz
6 messages
2011/07/01
[#37716] Re: test fail test/matrix/test_matrix.rb:321
— KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...>
2011/07/01
2011/7/1 KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com>:
[#37723] Re: test fail test/matrix/test_matrix.rb:321
— Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core-mailing-list@...>
2011/07/01
Test fixed, thanks (indeed, Matrix#** now implements non integer exponents).
[#37729] Re: test fail test/matrix/test_matrix.rb:321
— KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...>
2011/07/02
2011/7/2 Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core-mailing-list@marc-andre.ca>:
[#37724] open-ssl related errors on MacOSX — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
Hi,
6 messages
2011/07/01
[#37725] Re: open-ssl related errors on MacOSX
— Martin Bo煬et <martin.bosslet@...>
2011/07/02
2011/7/2 SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net>:
[#37728] Re: open-ssl related errors on MacOSX
— Martin Bo煬et <martin.bosslet@...>
2011/07/02
2011/7/2 Martin Bo煬et <martin.bosslet@googlemail.com>:
[#37730] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4962][Open] come back gem_prelude! — Yusuke Endoh <mame@...>
24 messages
2011/07/02
[#37833] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4962] come back gem_prelude!
— Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>
2011/07/06
[#37813] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4962][Open] come back gem_prelude!
— Aaron Patterson <aaron@...>
2011/07/05
On Sat, Jul 02, 2011 at 02:18:35PM +0900, Yusuke Endoh wrote:
[#37757] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4969][Open] Subtle issue with require — Thomas Sawyer <transfire@...>
13 messages
2011/07/03
[#37758] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4969] Subtle issue with require
— Thomas Sawyer <transfire@...>
2011/07/03
[#37831] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4969] Subtle issue with require
— Thomas Sawyer <transfire@...>
2011/07/06
[#40160] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4969] Subtle issue with require
— Thomas Sawyer <transfire@...>
2011/10/15
[#40162] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4969] Subtle issue with require
— Thomas Sawyer <transfire@...>
2011/10/15
[#37761] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4970][Open] FileUtils refactored — Thomas Sawyer <transfire@...>
10 messages
2011/07/03
[#37805] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #4979][Open] `require 'foo'` is ambiguous when there is both foo.rb and foo.so — Antonio Terceiro <terceiro@...>
4 messages
2011/07/05
[#37840] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4985][Open] Add %S[] support for making a list of symbols — Aaron Patterson <aaron@...>
23 messages
2011/07/07
[#46005] [ruby-trunk - Feature #4985] Add %S[] support for making a list of symbols
— "tenderlovemaking (Aaron Patterson)" <aaron@...>
2012/06/30
[#46091] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #4985] Add %S[] support for making a list of symbols
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2012/07/01
I guessed that %S(...) is S-expr syntax.
[#37853] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4989][Open] Document Socket constants — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>
10 messages
2011/07/07
[#37870] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4989] Document Socket constants
— Motohiro KOSAKI <kosaki.motohiro@...>
2011/07/08
[#37877] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4989] Document Socket constants
— James Cox <james@...>
2011/07/08
Why change all the statuses to low here? I don't see the validity of
[#37878] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4989] Document Socket constants
— KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...>
2011/07/08
Hi
[#37893] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4989] Document Socket constants
— James Cox <james@...>
2011/07/08
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 08:25, KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com> wrote:
[#37858] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4992][Open] finalizer中のThread.newでSEGV — Shota Fukumori <sorah@...>
8 messages
2011/07/08
[#37859] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4992] finalizer中のThread.newでSEGV
— Shota Fukumori <sorah@...>
2011/07/08
[#37860] Re: [ruby-core:37859] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4992] finalizer中のThread.newでSEGV
— KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...>
2011/07/08
> -- Thread.new in finalizer raises SEGV
[#37866] [Backport87 - Feature #4996][Open] About 1.8.7 EOL — Shyouhei Urabe <shyouhei@...>
22 messages
2011/07/08
[#38427] [Backport87 - Feature #4996] About 1.8.7 EOL
— Brian Candler <b.candler@...>
2011/07/23
[#37913] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5003][Open] Enumerator#next segfaults in OS X Lion (10.7) — Ganesh Gunasegaran <ganesh.gunas@...>
16 messages
2011/07/09
[#37917] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5005][Open] Provide convenient access to original methods — Lazaridis Ilias <ilias@...>
13 messages
2011/07/09
[#37932] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5008][Open] Equal rights for Hash (like Array, String, Integer, Float) — Suraj Kurapati <sunaku@...>
31 messages
2011/07/09
[#43310] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5008] Equal rights for Hash (like Array, String, Integer, Float)
— Suraj Kurapati <sunaku@...>
2012/03/15
[#43849] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5008] Equal rights for Hash (like Array, String, Integer, Float)
— "rosenfeld (Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas)" <rr.rosas@...>
2012/03/29
[#43855] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #5008] Equal rights for Hash (like Array, String, Integer, Float)
— Adam Prescott <adam@...>
2012/03/29
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 13:25, rosenfeld (Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas) <
[#37936] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5010][Open] Add Slop(-like) in stdlib and deprecate current OptionParser API — Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...>
29 messages
2011/07/09
[#37939] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5010][Open] Add Slop(-like) in stdlib and deprecate current OptionParser API
— Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
2011/07/09
Hi,
[#37940] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5010][Open] Add Slop(-like) in stdlib and deprecate current OptionParser API
— Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...>
2011/07/09
Em 09-07-2011 20:13, Nobuyoshi Nakada escreveu:
[#49817] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5010] Add Slop(-like) in stdlib and deprecate current OptionParser API
— "rosenfeld (Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas)" <rr.rosas@...>
2012/11/21
[#37985] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #2616] unable to trap in doze — Motohiro KOSAKI <kosaki.motohiro@...>
3 messages
2011/07/11
[#37988] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5016][Open] Kernel#caller with negative limit should limit result to N initial frames — Nikolai Weibull <now@...>
6 messages
2011/07/11
[#38011] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5018][Open] ruby_1_9_3 branch is missing from official GitHub mirror — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>
5 messages
2011/07/11
[#38096] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5033][Open] PATCH: 1.9: gc_mark_children: Avoid gc_mark() tail recursion, use goto again. — Kurt Stephens <ks.ruby@...>
14 messages
2011/07/16
[#38109] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5034][Open] C Source Code formatting — Lazaridis Ilias <ilias@...>
18 messages
2011/07/16
[#38137] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5038][Open] Ruby 1.9.2 stops on some Regular Expressions — Bob Ambartsumov <bob@...>
4 messages
2011/07/17
[#38140] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5041][Open] Set FD_CLOEXEC for all fds (except 0, 1, 2) — Akira Tanaka <akr@...>
9 messages
2011/07/17
[#38158] Proposal to merge net2-http for Ruby 1.9.4 — Yehuda Katz <wycats@...>
I gave a talk at Ruby Kaigi about my work on Net::HTTP (
10 messages
2011/07/18
[#38179] Re: Proposal to merge net2-http for Ruby 1.9.4
— Tanaka Akira <akr@...>
2011/07/19
2011/7/18 Yehuda Katz <wycats@gmail.com>:
[#38227] Re: Proposal to merge net2-http for Ruby 1.9.4
— Yehuda Katz <wycats@...>
2011/07/20
Yehuda Katz
[#38164] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5046][Open] Bug with xmlrpc::client, basic auth and long authentication strings — Herwin Weststrate <herwin@...>
4 messages
2011/07/18
[#38171] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5047][Open] Segfault (most likely involving require) — Jack Christensen <jack@...>
21 messages
2011/07/18
[#38375] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5047] Segfault (most likely involving require)
— Hiroshi Nakamura <nakahiro@...>
2011/07/22
[#38405] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5047] Segfault (most likely involving require)
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2011/07/22
Hiroshi Nakamura <nakahiro@gmail.com> wrote:
[#38406] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5047] Segfault (most likely involving require)
— Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>
2011/07/22
On Jul 22, 2011, at 2:41 PM, Eric Wong wrote:
[#38436] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5047] Segfault (most likely involving require)
— Hiroshi Nakamura <nakahiro@...>
2011/07/24
[#38465] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5047] Segfault (most likely involving require)
— Motohiro KOSAKI <kosaki.motohiro@...>
2011/07/24
[#38495] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5047] Segfault (most likely involving require)
— Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...>
2011/07/25
Thank you for the trying the patch.
[#38172] [Backport87 - Backport #5048][Open] Make failed on tk bindings under OSX Lion fresh install — "Wayne E. Seguin" <wayneeseguin@...>
7 messages
2011/07/18
[#38182] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5054][Open] Compress a sequence of ends — ANDO Yasushi ANDO <andyjpn@...>
68 messages
2011/07/19
[#38188] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5054] Compress a sequence of ends
— Steve Klabnik <steve@...>
2011/07/19
[#38236] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5054] Compress a sequence of ends
— Akinori MUSHA <knu@...>
2011/07/20
[#38197] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5056][Open] About 1.9 EOL — Shyouhei Urabe <shyouhei@...>
39 messages
2011/07/19
[#38900] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5056] About 1.9 EOL
— Shota Fukumori <sorah@...>
2011/08/10
[#38902] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5056] About 1.9 EOL
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2011/08/10
Hi,
[#39048] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5056] About 1.9 EOL
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2011/08/22
Hi,
[#39055] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5056] About 1.9 EOL
— Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@...>
2011/08/23
On 23/08/11 at 06:50 +0900, SASADA Koichi wrote:
[#39056] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5056] About 1.9 EOL
— "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...>
2011/08/23
(2011/08/23 20:09), Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
[#39060] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5056] About 1.9 EOL
— Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@...>
2011/08/23
On 23/08/11 at 20:20 +0900, NARUSE, Yui wrote:
[#38271] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5056] About 1.9 EOL
— Shyouhei Urabe <shyouhei@...>
2011/07/20
[#38291] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5056] About 1.9 EOL
— Motohiro KOSAKI <kosaki.motohiro@...>
2011/07/21
[#38334] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5056] About 1.9 EOL
— Benoit Daloze <eregontp@...>
2011/07/21
Hello,
[#38295] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5064][Open] HTTP user-agent class — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>
15 messages
2011/07/21
[#38516] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5064] HTTP user-agent class
— Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>
2011/07/26
[#38502] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5064] HTTP user-agent class
— Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>
2011/07/25
[#38343] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5068][Open] Issue with "duplicated when clause is ignored" — Stefano Mioli <stefano.mioli@...>
7 messages
2011/07/21
[#38367] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5072][Open] Avoid inadvertent symbol creation in reflection methods — Jeremy Evans <merch-redmine@...>
6 messages
2011/07/21
[#38391] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5076][Open] Mac OS X Lion Support — Yui NARUSE <naruse@...>
17 messages
2011/07/22
[#38451] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5090][Open] Segfault using Enumerator — Robert Syme <rob.syme@...>
8 messages
2011/07/24
[#38464] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5091][Open] Can't require './.testrb' — Thomas Sawyer <transfire@...>
4 messages
2011/07/24
[#38491] 1.9.3 Status Update? — Joshua Ballanco <jballanc@...>
Hello ruby-core,
1 message
2011/07/25
[#38510] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5097][Assigned] Supported platforms of Ruby 1.9.3 — Yui NARUSE <naruse@...>
42 messages
2011/07/26
[#38525] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5097][Assigned] Supported platforms of Ruby 1.9.3
— Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>
2011/07/26
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 11:52 PM, Yui NARUSE <naruse@airemix.jp> wrote:
[#38511] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5097][Assigned] Supported platforms of Ruby 1.9.3
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2011/07/26
Yui NARUSE <naruse@airemix.jp> wrote:
[#38538] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5101][Open] allow optional timeout for TCPSocket.new — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
15 messages
2011/07/27
[#38580] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5101][Open] allow optional timeout for TCPSocket.new
— Tanaka Akira <akr@...>
2011/07/28
2011/7/27 Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>:
[#38590] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5101][Open] allow optional timeout for TCPSocket.new
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2011/07/28
Tanaka Akira <akr@fsij.org> wrote:
[#38598] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5101][Open] allow optional timeout for TCPSocket.new
— Tanaka Akira <akr@...>
2011/07/29
2011/7/29 Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>:
[#38651] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5101][Open] allow optional timeout for TCPSocket.new
— Tanaka Akira <akr@...>
2011/08/01
2011/7/30 Tanaka Akira <akr@fsij.org>:
[#38610] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5120][Open] String#split needs to be logical — Alexey Muranov <muranov@...>
18 messages
2011/07/30
[ruby-core:38572] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5097] Supported platforms of Ruby 1.9.3
From:
Jeremy Evans <merch-redmine@...>
Date:
2011-07-28 00:50:25 UTC
List:
ruby-core #38572
Issue #5097 has been updated by Jeremy Evans.
File ruby193.log added
File ruby193.diff added
> Jeremy Evans wrote:
> > Attached is the make check output on OpenBSD amd64. I'm also attaching a diff with the patches I used:
> >
> > * bootstraptest/test_thread.rb: Skip 2 tests. The first one appears to hang, the second crashes with a sigaltstack error.
>
> signalstack error seems because of the lack of OpenBSD specific setting.
> see thread_pthread.c:506 and edit it.
I don't think the problem is there, as reading the documentation the call there (pthread_stackseg_np(pthread_self(), &stk)) appears to be correct. The error I get in the 2nd bootstrap test is "rb_register_sigaltstack. malloc error", which comes from signal.c:
439 newSS.ss_sp = th->altstack = malloc(ALT_STACK_SIZE);
440 if (newSS.ss_sp == NULL)
441 /* should handle error */
442 rb_bug("rb_register_sigaltstack. malloc error\n");
If you change the rb_bug call to a return, the 2nd bootstrap test passes. I'm not sure if that's a valid fix, as it probably affects signal handling for the thread. I first tried to change it to raise NoMemError, but that causes a segfault. Like the comment there states, the error should be handled, but I'm not sure how best to do that. I don't think this is an error caused by OpenBSD, just one that only manifests itself on OpenBSD.
The 1st bootstrap error appears to be the threads not exiting when the process exits, causing the threads to hang. It can be reproduced with a single thread (ruby19 -e "Thread.new{loop{Thread.pass}}"). The hang doesn't happen if you use while instead of loop (ruby19 -e 'Thread.new{Thread.pass while true}'). Any ideas?
> > * configure: Use -pthread instead of -lpthread when linking. From OpenBSD man pages: "On OpenBSD, the -pthread option should be used to link threaded code, isolating the program from operating system details."
>
> A patch should be for portable and for configure.in.
I think I've got a working patch, it's attached.
> > Use OpenBSD shared library naming convention (libruby19.so.1.0, as 1.9.2 used libruby19.so.0.0).
>
> What is LIBruby19_VERSION?
You can ignore that. On OpenBSD, the ports system sets the shared library numbers, because most software doesn't handle the library versioning correctly (bumping the minor for new functions, bumping the major for removed functions or changes in functions). But that's not something you are going to want pulled upstream.
> > Don't include OpenBSD version number in $arch. OpenBSD version numbers do not have any relationship to API/ABI compatibility.
>
> On *BSD/Mac OS X includes version to arch.
> It seems independent from API/ABI compatibility.
Including the version number means that every time the version number changes, all dependent ports that use sitearchdir need to be modified slightly. What's the rational behind including the operating system version if not for API/ABI compatibility?
> > * ext/socket/lib/socket.rb: Don't check ipv6_recvpktinfo. This fixes a failure in one of the socket tests:
>
> Why this fixes the problem?
> We can't merge this without understanding.
I think this is a general bug in the code. If ipv6_recvpktinfo is true (which it is on OpenBSD since OpenBSD supports IPV6_PKTINFO), the Addrinfo for IPV6 address "::" is not added as a socket to use. The code looks like this:
516 elsif ai.ipv6? && ai.ip_address == "::" && !ipv6_recvpktinfo
517 local_addrs.each {|a|
518 next if !a.ipv6?
519 ip_list << Addrinfo.new(a.to_sockaddr, :INET6, :DGRAM, 0);
520 }
527 sockets = ip_sockets_port0(ip_list, false)
544 pktinfo_sockets = {}
545 sockets.each {|s|
546 ai = s.local_address
547 if ipv6_recvpktinfo && ai.ipv6? && ai.ip_address == "::"
548 s.setsockopt(:IPV6, ipv6_recvpktinfo, 1)
549 pktinfo_sockets[s] = true
550 end
551 }
The pktinfo_sockets hash here is never used. And even if it was, because you are not adding the '::' address to ip_addrs if ipv6_recvpktinfo, no socket is being created for it, so you will never hit lines 548-549. The attached patch removes the "&& !ipv6_recvpktinfo" from 516 and the pktinfo_sockets hash handling.
> > Even with the attached patch, there are 5 failures. 3 failures are weird linking errors in the rake tests I don't understand ("ruby lib version (1.9.3) doesn't match executable version (1.9.4)").
>
> Hmm, I don't know about it.
This appeared to be caused by my use of a non-pristine checkout. I did a pristine checkout and they went away.
> > 2 failures appear to be caused by using GNU make syntax in the makefiles. On 1.9.2, BSD make was able to work with the makefiles, but starting on 1.9.3, it appears GNU make is required. Either makefiles should use not use GNU extensions or ruby should use gmake instead of make on BSD systems.
>
> It's strange because on FreeBSD and NetBSD, BSD make works correctly.
There is the same bug in about 4 files that causes this, the submitted patch includes the fixes and makes everything compile with OpenBSD make. This is because the old=new modifier must be the last modifier in a BSD make variable substituion, and both those files contained a trailing :, which I'm guessing indicates another modifier. I guess OpenBSD make is more strict than the other BSD makes, but the last modifier behavior is specified in the FreeBSD make man page as well.
I ran make check and found the following errors:
4 errors in test/unit's test::parallel tests caused by bugs, a patch for these is included.
3 errors in rake's tests that are caused by assuming that ruby is installed as "ruby". If you configure with --program-suffix, these fail. A patch for these is included.
The rlimit hang is caused because setting the RLIMIT_NOFILE to 0 causes ruby to hang on exit in OpenBSD. Setting it to 1 does not cause it to hang. I added a patch that modifies the test code to use 1 instead of 0, but if you'd like a patch to process.c to use 1 if 0 is given on OpenBSD, I can do that.
With the attached patch, there are no errors. There is a error in one of the timeout tests in the log, but that's spurious:
$ ruby19 -v test/test_timeout.rb
ruby 1.9.3dev (2011-07-28) [x86_64-openbsd5.0]
Run options:
# Running tests:
...
Finished tests in 1.422562s, 2.1089 tests/s, 2.8118 assertions/s.
3 tests, 4 assertions, 0 failures, 0 errors, 0 skips
----------------------------------------
Feature #5097: Supported platforms of Ruby 1.9.3
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/5097
Author: Yui NARUSE
Status: Assigned
Priority: Normal
Assignee: Yui NARUSE
Category:
Target version: 1.9.3
Let's decide the supported platforms.
== Background
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/projects/ruby-19/wiki/SupportedPlatforms
== Process
If you want to support a platform, please declare.
But when a platform dependent bug is reported, it will be assigned to you.
== Current Maintainer
mswin32, mswin64 (Microsoft Windows):
NAKAMURA Usaku (usa)
mingw32 (Minimalist GNU for Windows):
Nobuyoshi Nakada (nobu)
IA-64 (Debian GNU/Linux):
TAKANO Mitsuhiro (takano32)
Symbian OS:
Alexander Zavorine (azov)
AIX:
Yutaka Kanemoto (kanemoto)
FreeBSD:
Akinori MUSHA (knu)
Solaris:
Naohisa Goto
RHEL, CentOS
KOSAKI Motohiro
Platforms which doesn't have a maintainer are following:
* Debian
* Ubuntu
* Mac OS X (LLVM related issues)
* cygwin (don't work)
* NetBSD (works)
* OpenBSD (it may not work)
* DragonFlyBSD (don't work)
--
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org