[#33640] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4136][Open] Enumerable#reject should not inherit the receiver's instance variables — Hiro Asari <redmine@...>

Bug #4136: Enumerable#reject should not inherit the receiver's instance variables

10 messages 2010/12/08

[#33667] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4149][Open] Documentation submission: syslog standard library — mathew murphy <redmine@...>

Bug #4149: Documentation submission: syslog standard library

11 messages 2010/12/10

[#33683] [feature:trunk] Enumerable#categorize — Tanaka Akira <akr@...>

Hi.

14 messages 2010/12/12
[#33684] Re: [feature:trunk] Enumerable#categorize — "Martin J. Dst" <duerst@...> 2010/12/12

[#33687] Towards a standardized AST for Ruby code — Magnus Holm <judofyr@...>

Hey folks,

23 messages 2010/12/12
[#33688] Re: Towards a standardized AST for Ruby code — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...> 2010/12/12

On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 9:55 AM, Magnus Holm <judofyr@gmail.com> wrote:

[#33689] Re: Towards a standardized AST for Ruby code — "Haase, Konstantin" <Konstantin.Haase@...> 2010/12/12

On Dec 12, 2010, at 17:46 , Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:

[#33763] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4168][Open] WeakRef is unsafe to use in Ruby 1.9 — Brian Durand <redmine@...>

Bug #4168: WeakRef is unsafe to use in Ruby 1.9

43 messages 2010/12/17

[#33815] trunk warnflags build issue with curb 0.7.9? — Jon <jon.forums@...>

As this may turn out to be a 3rd party issue rather than a bug, I'd like some feedback.

11 messages 2010/12/22

[#33833] Ruby 1.9.2 is going to be released — "Yuki Sonoda (Yugui)" <yugui@...>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

15 messages 2010/12/23

[#33846] [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4197][Open] Improvement of the benchmark library — Benoit Daloze <redmine@...>

Feature #4197: Improvement of the benchmark library

15 messages 2010/12/23

[#33910] [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4211][Open] Converting the Ruby and C API documentation to YARD syntax — Loren Segal <redmine@...>

Feature #4211: Converting the Ruby and C API documentation to YARD syntax

10 messages 2010/12/26

[#33923] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4214][Open] Fiddle::WINDOWS == false on Windows — Jon Forums <redmine@...>

Bug #4214: Fiddle::WINDOWS == false on Windows

15 messages 2010/12/27

[ruby-core:33851] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4198][Open] parse error involving spaceship operator

From: B Kelly <redmine@...>
Date: 2010-12-24 00:30:59 UTC
List: ruby-core #33851
Bug #4198: parse error involving spaceship operator
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/show/4198

Author: B Kelly
Status: Open, Priority: Normal
Category: core, Target version: 1.9.2
ruby -v: ruby 1.9.2p110 (2010-12-20 revision 30269) [i386-darwin10.4.0]

Hi,

I'm not sure if this is a bug?  I'm getting a parse error on
the last line of the following code, unless I add parenthesis:

op-test-simple.rb
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
class Opper
  def / (other)
    self
  end
  def + (other)
    self
  end
  def <=> (other)
    self
  end
end

foo = Opper.new("foo")
bar = Opper.new("bar")
baz = Opper.new("baz")
quux = Opper.new("quux")
joe = Opper.new("joe")
mama = Opper.new("mama")
so = Opper.new("so")
fat = Opper.new("fat")
quick = Opper.new("quick")
brown = Opper.new("brown")
fox = Opper.new("fox")

foo + bar /
baz + quux /
joe + mama <=> so + fat /
quick + brown <=> fox
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

$ ruby19 -v op-test-simple.rb
ruby 1.9.2p110 (2010-12-20 revision 30269) [i386-darwin10.4.0]
op-test-simple.rb:29: syntax error, unexpected tCMP
quick + brown <=> fox
                 ^
op-test-simple.rb:29: warning: useless use of a variable in void context


However, if parenthesis are added, like:

(quick + brown <=> fox)

or:

quick + (brown <=> fox)

then the parse error does not occur.


Regards,

Bill


----------------------------------------
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org

In This Thread

Prev Next