[#33000] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4014][Open] Case-Sensitivity of Property Names Depends on Regexp Encoding — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #4014: Case-Sensitivity of Property Names Depends on Regexp Encoding

11 messages 2010/11/01

[#33021] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4015][Open] File::DIRECT Constant for O_DIRECT — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>

Hi,

15 messages 2010/11/02

[#33139] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4044][Open] Regex matching errors when using \W character class and /i option — Ben Hoskings <redmine@...>

Bug #4044: Regex matching errors when using \W character class and /i option

8 messages 2010/11/11

[#33162] Windows Unicode (chcp 65001) Generates incorrect output — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>

Hello,

10 messages 2010/11/14

[#33246] [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4068][Open] Replace current standard Date/DateTime library with home_run — Jeremy Evans <redmine@...>

Feature #4068: Replace current standard Date/DateTime library with home_run

40 messages 2010/11/17

[#33255] [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4071][Open] support basic auth for Net::HTTP.get requests — "coderrr ." <redmine@...>

Feature #4071: support basic auth for Net::HTTP.get requests

23 messages 2010/11/19

[#33322] [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4085][Open] Refinements and nested methods — Shugo Maeda <redmine@...>

Feature #4085: Refinements and nested methods

94 messages 2010/11/24
[#33345] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4085][Open] Refinements and nested methods — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...> 2010/11/25

Hi,

[#33356] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4085][Open] Refinements and nested methods — Shugo Maeda <shugo@...> 2010/11/25

Hi,

[#33375] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4085][Open] Refinements and nested methods — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...> 2010/11/25

Hi,

[#33381] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4085][Open] Refinements and nested methods — Shugo Maeda <shugo@...> 2010/11/25

Hi,

[#33387] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4085][Open] Refinements and nested methods — Magnus Holm <judofyr@...> 2010/11/25

Woah, this is very nice stuff! Some comments/questions:

[#33487] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4085][Open] Refinements and nested methods — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...> 2010/11/30

This is a long response, and for that I apologize. I want to make sure

[#33535] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4085][Open] Refinements and nested methods — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...> 2010/12/03

Hi,

[#33519] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4085][Open] Refinements and nested methods — Shugo Maeda <shugo@...> 2010/12/02

Hi,

[#33523] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4085][Open] Refinements and nested methods — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...> 2010/12/02

Hi,

[#33539] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4085][Open] Refinements and nested methods — Shugo Maeda <shugo@...> 2010/12/03

Hi,

[#33543] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4085][Open] Refinements and nested methods — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...> 2010/12/03

Hi,

[#33546] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4085][Open] Refinements and nested methods — Shugo Maeda <shugo@...> 2010/12/03

Hi,

[#33548] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4085][Open] Refinements and nested methods — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...> 2010/12/03

Hi,

[#33567] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4085][Open] Refinements and nested methods — Shugo Maeda <shugo@...> 2010/12/04

Hi,

[#33595] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4085][Open] Refinements and nested methods — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...> 2010/12/06

On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 6:32 AM, Shugo Maeda <shugo@ruby-lang.org> wrote:

[#33367] Planning to release 1.8.7 fixes on 12/25 (Japanese timezone) — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...>

Hello,

20 messages 2010/11/25
[#33439] Re: Planning to release 1.8.7 fixes on 12/25 (Japanese timezone) — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2010/11/27

2010/11/25 Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@ruby-lang.org>:

[#33456] [Request for Comment] avoid timer thread — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>

Hi,

25 messages 2010/11/29
[#35152] Re: [Request for Comment] avoid timer thread — Mark Somerville <mark@...> 2011/02/08

On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 11:53:03AM +0900, SASADA Koichi wrote:

[#36077] Re: [Request for Comment] avoid timer thread — Mark Somerville <mark@...> 2011/05/09

On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 09:24:13PM +0900, Mark Somerville wrote:

[#36952] Re: [Request for Comment] avoid timer thread — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2011/06/10

Mark Somerville <mark@scottishclimbs.com> wrote:

[#37080] Re: [Request for Comment] avoid timer thread — Mark Somerville <mark@...> 2011/06/13

On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 05:57:11AM +0900, Eric Wong wrote:

[#37103] Re: [Request for Comment] avoid timer thread — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2011/06/13

Mark Somerville <mark@scottishclimbs.com> wrote:

[#37187] Re: [Request for Comment] avoid timer thread — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2011/06/16

(2011/06/14 3:37), Eric Wong wrote:

[#37195] Re: [Request for Comment] avoid timer thread — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2011/06/17

SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:

[#37205] Re: [Request for Comment] avoid timer thread — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2011/06/17

Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> wrote:

[#33469] [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4100][Open] Improve Net::HTTP documentation — Eric Hodel <redmine@...>

Feature #4100: Improve Net::HTTP documentation

12 messages 2010/11/29

[ruby-core:33256] [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4073][Open] HKSCS-2008

From: oCameLo oTnTh <redmine@...>
Date: 2010-11-19 10:10:00 UTC
List: ruby-core #33256
Feature #4073: HKSCS-2008
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/show/4073

Author: oCameLo oTnTh
Status: Open, Priority: Normal
Category: M17N, Target version: 1.9.2

I suspect that Big5-HKSCS in Ruby missed out some mappings during use it, so I extracted a Big5-HKSCS conversion table from c_951.nls (HKSCS-2001, [1]) and used it to check big5-hkscs-tbl.rb. Except the characters were assigned to PUA in HKSCS-2001, the tbl file missed out 8 characters:

    cF9E9 => u255E # '╞'
    cF9EA => u256A # '╪'
    cF9EB => u2561 # '╡'
    cF9F9 => u2550 # '═'
    cF9FA => u256D # '╭'
    cF9FB => u256E # '╮'
    cF9FC => u2570 # '╰'
    cF9FD => u256F # '╯'

And these 8 characters were included in CP951 but not in the tbl file:

    cA15A => u2574 # '╴'
    cA1C3 => uFFE3 # '‾'
    cA1C5 => u02CD # 'ˍ'
    cA1FE => uFF0F # '/'
    cA240 => uFF3C # '\'
    cA2CC => u5341 # '十'
    cA2CE => u5345 # '卅'
    cA3E1 => u20AC # '€'

HKSCS is just a supplementary set of Big5, but they didn't finger out which kind of Big5 base on. Consider for compatibility, I think CP951 is a good choice. Also, HKSCS-2008 ([2]) was released for a long time. So I tried to combine CP951 and HKSCS-2008 together to make a new tbl file, but I met some problems.

First, HKSCS-2008 included 3 ligatures:

    c8862 => <00CA,0304>
    c8864 => <00CA,030C>
    c88A3 => <00EA,0304>
    c88A5 => <00EA,030C>

Does Ruby support this, if so, how to code?

Then, these mappings were included in CP951:

    cA2CC, cA451 => u5341
    cA2CE, cA4CA => u5345
    cA2A5, cF9E9 => u255E
    cA2A6, cF9EA => u256A
    cA2A7, cF9EB => u2561
    cA2A4, cF9F9 => u2550
    cA27E, cF9FA => u256D
    cA2A1, cF9FB => u256E
    cA2A2, cF9FC => u2570
    cA2A3, cF9FD => u256F

    u5341 => cA451
    u5345 => cA4CA
    u255E => cF9E9
    u256A => cF9EA
    u2561 => cF9EB
    u2550 => cF9F9
    u256D => cF9FA
    u256E => cF9FB
    u2570 => cF9FC
    u256F => cF9FD

Same question, does Ruby support this, if so, how to code?

Thanks.

[1] http://www.microsoft.com/hk/hkscs/
[2] http://www.ogcio.gov.hk/ccli/chs/hkscs/mapping_table_2008.html


----------------------------------------
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org

In This Thread

Prev Next