[#2367] Standard libraries — Dave Thomas <dave@...>

From ruby-dev summary:

60 messages 2004/02/11

[#2397] PATCH: deprecate cgi-lib, getopts, importenv, parsearg from standard library — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...>

Index: cgi-lib.rb

15 messages 2004/02/12

[#2465] PATCH: OpenStruct#initialize to yield self — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...>

This is a common approach I use to object initialization; I don't know

24 messages 2004/02/19

Re: Standard libraries

From: "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nahi@...>
Date: 2004-02-12 04:19:09 UTC
List: ruby-core #2380
Hi,

> From: "Gavin Sinclair" <gsinclair@soyabean.com.au>
> Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2004 12:41 PM

> > RDoc style is a must?  I don't like documentation buried within
> > a source code (code duplication for me).
> 
> RDoc is the standard way to document standard library files.

In Japanese 1.4/1.6 document, "standard library" is distinct
from "bundled library".  I believe my libraries are just
"bundled" not "standard" library.

Anyway, regardless of terminology thing, the libs that matz
authorized should be distinct from the libs just bundled I think.

Regards,
// NaHi

In This Thread