[#1651] A min/max bug? — "Christoph" <chr_news@...>
Hi,
[#1690] Re: open-uri patch, added progress_proc hook — Elliott Hughes <ehughes@...>
In effect. I mean that if a method's interface is getting too complicated,
In article <AD4480A509455343AEFACCC231BA850F17C358@ukexchange>,
On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 07:51:42PM +0900, Tanaka Akira wrote:
[#1699] FileUtils bug and fix — Chad Fowler <chad@...>
As posted in ruby-talk:85349, I believe there is a bug in FileUtils.cp's
[#1706] gc_sweep in Ruby 1.8 — Richard Kilmer <rich@...>
I posted about this before but Matz wanted me to post more detail.
>>>>> "R" == Richard Kilmer <rich@infoether.com> writes:
[#1711] Re: open-uri patch, added progress_proc hook — "T. Onoma" <transami@...>
Tanaka Akira:
On Sunday 23 November 2003 07:12 pm, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
On Sunday 23 November 2003 08:26 pm, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
On Sunday 23 November 2003 09:32 pm, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
On Sunday 23 November 2003 11:13 pm, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 05:32:09AM +0900, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
[#1716] Re: open-uri patch, added progress_proc hook — "T. Onoma" <transami@...>
Tanaka Akira:
[#1718] Re: open-uri patch, added progress_proc hook — Elliott Hughes <ehughes@...>
In article <AD4480A509455343AEFACCC231BA850F17C434@ukexchange>,
On Saturday 22 November 2003 04:34 pm, Tanaka Akira wrote:
In article <200311221024.05642.transami@runbox.com>,
On Sunday 23 November 2003 02:24 am, Tanaka Akira wrote:
In article <200311230325.21687.transami@runbox.com>,
On Sunday 23 November 2003 03:10 pm, Tanaka Akira wrote:
In article <200311230648.41003.transami@runbox.com>,
On Monday 24 November 2003 03:19, Tanaka Akira wrote:
Sean E Russell [mailto:ser@germane-software.com] wrote:
[#1753] gc_sweep under 1.8 ... not syck.so — Richard Kilmer <rich@...>
We still encountered a gc_sweep in our use of Ruby 1.8 on Linux (v8).
>>>>> "R" == Richard Kilmer <rich@infoether.com> writes:
Yes, there are several (Ruby) threads working during this gc_sweep.
>>>>> "R" == Richard Kilmer <rich@infoether.com> writes:
of course this effects 300 machines ;-)
>>>>> "R" == Richard Kilmer <rich@infoether.com> writes:
The saga continues:
>>>>> "R" == Richard Kilmer <rich@infoether.com> writes:
There is a discussion (found by chad fowler) on ruby-dev (22000)
[#1755] Re: Controlled block variables — Jamis Buck <jgb3@...>
On Mon, 2003-11-24 at 02:04, T. Onoma wrote:
On Monday 24 November 2003 05:22 pm, Jamis Buck wrote:
On Monday 24 November 2003 11:51, T. Onoma wrote:
On Monday 24 November 2003 06:40 pm, Sean E Russell wrote:
On Tue, 25 Nov 2003, T. Onoma wrote:
On Monday 24 November 2003 14:02, T. Onoma wrote:
On Monday 24 November 2003 09:15 pm, Sean E Russell wrote:
[#1799] Syck install on Debian Standard (Ruby 1.6.7) — "T. Onoma" <transami@...>
Hi, I'm having some trouble installing Syck on Debain (woody). I'm not
On Friday 28 November 2003 09:17 am, T. Onoma wrote:
On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 05:22:48PM +0900, T. Onoma wrote:
[#1819] Re: configure.in: do not override CCDLDFLAGS, LDFLAGS, XLDFLAGS — Eric Sunshine <sunshine@...>
Hello,
Re: Code duplication in core libraries
Hehehe re sometimes copy and paste is deliberate. I'll check it out. I feel like an idiot now. It was late when I ran it and I only checked a few I'll double check this stuff again before posting. Cheers, Simon On Mon, 2003-11-03 at 21:53, Elliott Hughes wrote: > It's not very informative. I wasn't able to find the duplication it's > complaining about. I think you'll have to find out how to get it to show > more context. You'll also need to teach it about comments. > > To pick a random example where I could roughly tell what it was talking > about [apart from why it talks about 15 lines between 1 and 20]: > > Found 15 duplicate lines in the following files: > Between lines 1 and 20 in /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/wsdl/xmlSchema/sequence.rb > Between lines 1 and 20 in /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/wsdl/xmlSchema/choice.rb > Between lines 1 and 20 in /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/wsdl/xmlSchema/content.rb > Between lines 1 and 20 in /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/wsdl/xmlSchema/all.rb > Between lines 1 and 20 in /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/wsdl/xmlSchema/complexType.rb > > Corresponds to: > > =begin > WSDL4R - XMLSchema complexType definition for WSDL. > Copyright (C) 2002, 2003 NAKAMURA, Hiroshi. > > This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it > under > the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free > Software > Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later > version. > > This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT > ANY > WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS > FOR A > PRATICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License for more details. > > You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along with > this program; if not, write to the Free Software Foundation, Inc., 675 Mass > Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA. > =end > > Sometimes copy & paste is deliberate! > > --elliott > > -----Original Message----- > From: Simon Harris [mailto:simon@redhillconsulting.com.au] > Sent: 2003-11-02 12:57 > To: ruby-core@ruby-lang.org > Subject: Code duplication in core libraries > > > FWIW, I ran a tool to identify duplicated code against the core ruby > libraries (1.8.0) that shipped > as part of my linux distro (gentoo) . > > I hope you find this of some use. > > Cheers, > > Simon -- http://www.redhillconsulting.com.au RedHill Consulting, Pty. Ltd. 12/55-67 Batman Street West Melbourne VIC 3003 +61 417 505 611