[#96321] parent of TrueClass, FalseClass — "Ara.T.Howard" <Ara.T.Howard@...>

19 messages 2004/04/01
[#96356] Re: parent of TrueClass, FalseClass — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/04/02

Hi,

[#96404] Variable names — David King Landrith <dlandrith@...>

About a year ago, I wrote a simple type enforcement library that adds a

33 messages 2004/04/02
[#96406] Re: Variable names — ts <decoux@...> 2004/04/02

>>>>> "D" == David King Landrith <dlandrith@mac.com> writes:

[#96424] Re: Variable names — David King Landrith <dlandrith@...> 2004/04/02

[#96430] Re: Variable names — Dan Doel <djd15@...> 2004/04/02

On Friday 02 April 2004 2:43 pm, David King Landrith wrote:

[#96432] Re: Variable names — David King Landrith <dlandrith@...> 2004/04/02

On Apr 2, 2004, at 3:51 PM, Dan Doel wrote:

[#96447] Learning Ruby, was a C geek... — Nicholas Paul Johnson <nickjohnson@...>

Hello all,

17 messages 2004/04/02

[#96634] Where does the name Rite come from? — Michael Neumann <mneumann@...>

Hi,

15 messages 2004/04/06
[#96642] Re: Where does the name Rite come from? — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/04/06

Hi,

[#96652] Re: Where does the name Rite come from? — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2004/04/06

Yukihiro Matsumoto (matz@ruby-lang.org) wrote:

[#96697] Idea: Simplified GTK — Hal Fulton <hal9000@...>

Here's an idea. I've begun implementing it.

74 messages 2004/04/07
[#96699] Re: Idea: Simplified GTK — Chad Fowler <chad@...> 2004/04/07

[#96876] RedCloth bug and suggestion — Jim Menard <jimm@...>

_why_ and fellow RedCloth users,

15 messages 2004/04/09

[#96877] Instiki 0.3.0: Before the Storm — David Heinemeier Hansson <david@...>

What's new in Instiki 0.3.0?

12 messages 2004/04/09

[#97020] test / unit question: facility to mark some tests as "missing" or "incomplete" — "Its Me" <itsme213@...>

I often find myself with some unit tests that run, and several more test

14 messages 2004/04/12

[#97077] Instiki 0.5.0: Getting Serious — David Heinemeier Hansson <david@...>

What's new in Instiki 0.5.0?

16 messages 2004/04/13

[#97083] New Ruby questions... — Jeff Massung <jma@...>

I've just started Ruby a couple days ago (man this is cool). Coming from

14 messages 2004/04/13

[#97109] New Local Variable Scope rule — "Shashank Date" <sdate@...>

In one of Matz's slides at RubyConf ,

33 messages 2004/04/14

[#97134] BlueCloth: a Markdown implementation for Ruby — Michael Granger <ged@...>

Hi all,

17 messages 2004/04/14

[#97201] File locking, portably? — Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...>

Searching the web and books for information on this, I can't seem to

12 messages 2004/04/14

[#97277] Hash, ==, key-value comparison — walter@...

Ok,

20 messages 2004/04/15

[#97308] Instiki 0.6.0: Feeds, Exports, Safety, and Compatibility — David Heinemeier Hansson <david@...>

What's new in Instiki 0.6.0?

14 messages 2004/04/15

[#97351] "bad file descriptor" in Win32 DLL — "Christian Kaiser" <chk@...>

Using Ruby 1.81, the DLL (msvcrt-ruby18.dll) sometimes raises an exception

14 messages 2004/04/16

[#97363] BlueCloth 0.0.2 (beta) — Michael Granger <ged@...>

Hi,

18 messages 2004/04/16
[#97399] BlueCloth on Instiki (was Re: [ANN] BlueCloth 0.0.2 (beta)) — David Heinemeier Hansson <david@...> 2004/04/16

> Thanks to all of you that have offered your suggestions and code. I

[#97405] RubyConf 2004 — Ian Macdonald <ian@...>

Hello,

46 messages 2004/04/17
[#97409] Re: RubyConf 2004 — Chad Fowler <chad@...> 2004/04/17

[#97460] Re: RubyConf 2004 — Paul Duncan <pabs@...> 2004/04/17

* Chad Fowler (chad@chadfowler.com) wrote:

[#97465] Re: RubyConf 2004 — Hal Fulton <hal9000@...> 2004/04/17

Paul Duncan wrote:

[#97466] Re: RubyConf 2004 — Chad Fowler <chad@...> 2004/04/17

[#97486] Ruby Installer for Windows 1.8.1-12 — "Curt Hibbs" <curt@...> 2004/04/18

The Ruby Installer 1.8.1-12 for Windows has been released and is now

[#97418] Objects in perl6 (rubyish :) — gabriele renzi <surrender_it@...1.vip.ukl.yahoo.com>

Hi gurus and nubys,

20 messages 2004/04/17

[#97426] $0 is messed up — Simon Strandgaard <neoneye@...>

I have just upgraded to 1.9 16-apr-2004 from 1.9 7-apr-2004.

15 messages 2004/04/17

[#97473] convert yield to proc — Simon Strandgaard <neoneye@...>

How do you guys convert yield to block ?

21 messages 2004/04/18

[#97565] Gateway — "Robert Klemme" <bob.news@...>

34 messages 2004/04/19

[#97628] Instiki 0.7.0: Flavors of Expression — David Heinemeier Hansson <david@...>

What's new in Instiki 0.7.0?

15 messages 2004/04/19

[#97631] proposal: call_up() for use in redefined methods — Mark Hubbart <discord@...>

Hi all,

18 messages 2004/04/19

[#97640] Fox --> GTK ? — Hal Fulton <hal9000@...>

Who has experience converting Fox to GTK and might like to

29 messages 2004/04/19

[#97705] The quest for opensource database... — "Ruby Tuesdays" <NoSpamPlease_rubytuzdaiz@...>

Perhaps you database guru able to suggest what would be a good choice for

35 messages 2004/04/20

[#97743] Setting up a wiki when you don't have root — ptkwt@... (Phil Tomson)

12 messages 2004/04/20

[#97785] Creating bang methods — "Jon Hurst" <jon@...>

(newbie) I can't for my life figure out how to create bang methods. Please

20 messages 2004/04/21

[#97797] rexml: how to get element type? — "Its Me" <itsme213@...>

doc = REXML::Document.new <<EOF

14 messages 2004/04/21

[#97808] binding - how to get current script? — Szymon Drejewicz <drejewic@...>

18 messages 2004/04/21

[#97866] Is Ruby is better than PHP ... — "Useko Netsumi" <usenets_remote_this@...>

or perhaps Java for developing web application?

46 messages 2004/04/21

[#97873] Re: how to get ri/rdoc working for 1.8.1 on Windows? — "John W. Kennedy" <jwkenne@...>

Part 1 is to chdir \Ruby\bin and delete the five *.bat files

41 messages 2004/04/21
[#97926] Re: how to get ri/rdoc working for 1.8.1 on Windows? — Lothar Scholz <mailinglists@...> 2004/04/21

Hello John,

[#97936] Re: how to get ri/rdoc working for 1.8.1 on Windows? — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/04/21

[#97971] Re: how to get ri/rdoc working for 1.8.1 on Windows? — Jos Backus <jos@...> 2004/04/21

On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 05:50:40AM +0900, Dave Thomas wrote:

[#97985] Re: how to get ri/rdoc working for 1.8.1 on Windows? — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/04/22

[#97910] Re: how to get ri/rdoc working for 1.8.1 on Windows? — "Its Me" <itsme213@...> 2004/04/21

[#97964] Re: how to get ri/rdoc working for [user-installed libraries] — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...> 2004/04/21

On Thursday, April 22, 2004, 4:44:09 AM, Its wrote:

[#97984] Re: how to get ri/rdoc working for [user-installed libraries] — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/04/22

[#98000] Re: how to get ri/rdoc working for [user-installed libraries] — "Gavin Sinclair" <gsinclair@...> 2004/04/22

>

[#97997] RedCloth 2.0.7 -- A Textile Humane Web Text Generator — why the lucky stiff <ruby-talk@...>

more and more, you've seen it all before (i swear it's slowin down):

12 messages 2004/04/22
[#98008] Re: [ANN] RedCloth 2.0.7 -- A Textile Humane Web Text Generator — David Heinemeier Hansson <david@...> 2004/04/22

> I've wanted this feature to work right for awhile. It took a rewrite

[#98101] Extract all occurences from a text — Michael Weller <michael@...>

Hi!

11 messages 2004/04/23

[#98135] Problem assigning an Array object to an Array-subclass object — "Richard Lionheart" <NoOne@...>

[ I apologize if this is a second post. My earlier one seems to have gotten

29 messages 2004/04/23

[#98177] Psyco — Jim Moy <web@...>

Interesting stuff for Python, is any work like this being done in Ruby?

14 messages 2004/04/23

[#98181] Playing with sockets... — Hal Fulton <hal9000@...>

I'm writing a little expect-like piece of code and trying to test it

16 messages 2004/04/23

[#98281] String#unpack and null-terminated strings — Michael Neumann <mneumann@...>

Hi,

15 messages 2004/04/24

[#98362] How's ruby compare to it older brother python — "Hunn E. Balsiche" <hunnebal@...>

in term of its OO features, syntax consistencies, ease of use, and their

51 messages 2004/04/26
[#98597] Re: How's ruby compare to it older brother python — "Ken Hilton" <kenosis@...> 2004/04/28

Amen, brother.

[#98778] Re: How's ruby compare to it older brother python — "trevor andrade" <trevor.andrade@...> 2004/04/30

I agree that flaming the question is not appropriate and its also bad for

[#98789] Re: How's ruby compare to it older brother python — Dan Doel <djd15@...> 2004/04/30

I'm not saying the topic isn't appropriate. I don't mind the topic, and I find

[#98365] Introducing myself - Sascha Ebach — Sascha Ebach <se@...>

Hello dear Rubyists,

51 messages 2004/04/26
[#98568] Re: Introducing myself - Sascha Ebach — "Josef 'Jupp' Schugt" <jupp@...> 2004/04/27

Hello from Beethoven's home town,

[#98569] Re: Introducing myself - Sascha Ebach — Sascha Ebach <se@...> 2004/04/27

Hello Jupp

[#98570] Re: Introducing myself - Sascha Ebach — Simon Strandgaard <neoneye@...> 2004/04/27

Sascha Ebach <se@hexatex.de> wrote:

[#98753] Re: Introducing myself - Sascha Ebach — "Josef 'Jupp' Schugt" <jupp@...> 2004/04/29

Simon Strandgaard wrote:

[#98762] Re: Introducing myself - Sascha Ebach — Simon Strandgaard <neoneye@...> 2004/04/29

Josef 'Jupp' Schugt <jupp@gmx.de> wrote:

[#98817] Opportunities and pitfalls; was "Introducing myself - Sascha Ebach" — Mike Calder <ceo@...> 2004/04/30

A word of warning from a potential friend. Please don't take this negatively,

[#98847] Re: Opportunities and pitfalls; was "Introducing myself - Sascha Ebach" — Mark Hubbart <discord@...> 2004/04/30

[#98854] Re: Opportunities and pitfalls; was "Introducing myself - Sascha Ebach" — "Curt Hibbs" <curt@...> 2004/04/30

Mark Hubbart wrote:

[#98858] Re: Opportunities and pitfalls; was "Introducing myself - Sascha Ebach" — Mark Hubbart <discord@...> 2004/04/30

[#98366] How do I scale large Ruby web applications? — Sascha Ebach <se@...>

Hi there,

19 messages 2004/04/26

[#98409] Semantics of Multiple Values — Kristof Bastiaensen <kristof@...>

Hi liszt,

25 messages 2004/04/26

[#98435] Approaches to localization? — ptkwt@... (Phil Tomson)

I'm developing a GUI app using Ruby and FLTK. One of the requirements

22 messages 2004/04/26

[#98714] Ruby under Suse Linux — Mike Calder <ceo@...>

Hi.

14 messages 2004/04/29

[#98750] coerce(), what protocol to implement it — Jean-Hugues ROBERT <jean_hugues_robert@...>

Hi,

14 messages 2004/04/29

[#98758] File.expand_path(__FILE__) — John Platte <john.platte@...>

I'm having a problem with File.expand_path(__FILE__) after a chdir.

30 messages 2004/04/29

[#98796] SciTE Ruby Lexer — Kaspar Schiess <eule@...>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

13 messages 2004/04/30

[#98820] ruby CVS can't use shared libs on NetBSD — Dick Davies <rasputnik@...>

11 messages 2004/04/30

[#98832] def [](v) xx; return yy; end # returned value is ignored !? — Jean-Hugues ROBERT <jean_hugues_robert@...>

Hi,

27 messages 2004/04/30

[#98851] Lazy evaluation — Michael Neumann <mneumann@...>

Hi,

51 messages 2004/04/30
[#98871] Re: Lazy evaluation — Jean-Hugues ROBERT <jean_hugues_robert@...> 2004/04/30

At 03:45 01/05/2004 +0900, you wrote:

[#98875] Re: Lazy evaluation — Florian Gross <flgr@...> 2004/04/30

Jean-Hugues ROBERT wrote:

[#98896] Re: Lazy evaluation (evil) — ptkwt@... (Phil Tomson) 2004/05/01

In article <c6uh31$gaq2i$1@ID-7468.news.uni-berlin.de>,

[#98913] Re: Lazy evaluation (evil) — Florian Gross <flgr@...> 2004/05/01

Phil Tomson wrote:

[#98917] Re: Lazy evaluation (evil) — ts <decoux@...> 2004/05/01

>>>>> "F" == Florian Gross <flgr@ccan.de> writes:

[#98919] Re: Lazy evaluation (evil) — Florian Gross <flgr@...> 2004/05/01

ts wrote:

Re: deciding between ruby and python

From: Jim Weirich <jim@...>
Date: 2004-04-02 04:25:59 UTC
List: ruby-talk #96368
Hal Fulton wrote:
> Ville Vainio wrote:
>> That is, string can know about sequences, but a sequence, being a more
>> general data type, should not know about strings.
 >
> I'd have to disagree. join, since it produces a string, obviously
> knows about strings even though it is not a string method.

I think Ville means that making join a method on a list means that lists 
must now know about strings.  Unfortunately, removing join as a list 
method still leaves lists knowledgeable about string for every object 
implements a to_s method.

In fact, knowing nothing but that to_s exists, you can write join like 
this ...

     def join(delimit)
       inject { |a, b| a.to_s + delimit + b.to_s }
     end

I have also heard (on c.l.py) that one reason the " ".join() form was 
chosen was to allow join to be polymorphic on string type.  This would 
allow join to be implemented differently in subclasses of string (such 
as a UnicodeString class perhaps).  Since join can be defined in terms 
of existing list methods (as we did above), there is no need to make 
polymorphic on lists or sequences.

However, making join a string method is neither necessary nor sufficient 
for a polymorphic behavior string subclass to be used.

For me, the big reason to make join a method in list is readability. 
Allowing methods chains that read linearly left to right is a big plus, 
overriding the other considerations in this case. (YMMV)

BTW, neither form is "more OO"  than the other.

>> As far as FP goes, allowing t.split w/o () is extremely non-FP,
>> because you lose first class functions. And FP without first class
>> functions is, well, Java.
> 
> I don't know FP either, but I thought method chaining was an important
> part of it. Because of the disconnect I mentioned earlier (where join
> is not actually acting on its receiver), the previous example doesn't
> show true method chaining.

Neither Ruby nor Python are functional languages, however both exhibit 
some features that are found in function languages.

When people think of features of functional languages, they primarily 
refer to two features in particular ..

(1) Stateless programming
(2) Higher order functions

Stateless programming means writing code that calculates a result 
without changing the state of the program as it executes.  This style of 
programming has many advantages, but neither Ruby nor Python adheres to 
this style, except in small snippets of code.

A functional language treats functions as first class data.  This means 
that functions can be passed about as data, and that operations can be 
performed on these functions that produce new functions.  A higher order 
function (in my perhaps flawed understanding) is a function that takes 
other functions as operands.

Here's a concrete example ... Suppose you had a function f(x,y) that 
returns the value x+y.  Now write a another function curry(f,n) that 
returns a brand-new function object.  This new function should take one 
argument (x) and return the value x+n (where n was the value passed to 
curry).

If your language can write functions like curry, then you have first 
class functions and higher order functions.  And this can be done in 
both Ruby and Python.

[... from an earlier message ...]
 >> actually, I tend to think Ruby's OO
 >> is crippled by not having functions as first class objects.

I find it interesting when people claim that Ruby has no first class 
functions, mostly because Ruby doesn't have functions in the first 
place.  What looks like functions are really methods on objects. 
Methods exist inside an object and like the proverbial quark, are never 
seen outside of an object.  Unlike functions which are explicitly 
called, methods are always invoked by an object in response to receiving 
message consisting of a message selector and a list of arguments. 
Sometimes we abbreviate and pretend we are calling functions, but it is 
still objects, methods and messages[1].

Question: If Ruby methods aren't function, how can we do functional 
programming?
Answer: With a poor man's function!

At this point it is useful to quote Anton van Straaten where he sums up 
his own enlightenment with these koan (see http://tinyurl.com/2m7p9):

     The venerable master Qc Na was walking with his student, Anton.
     Hoping to prompt the master into a discussion, Anton said "Master, I
     have heard that objects are a very good thing - is this true?" Qc Na
     looked pityingly at his student and replied, "Foolish pupil -
     objects are merely a poor man's closures."

     Chastised, Anton took his leave from his master and returned to his
     cell, intent on studying closures. He carefully read the entire
     "Lambda: The Ultimate..." series of papers and its cousins, and
     implemented a small Scheme interpreter with a closure-based object
     system. He learned much, and looked forward to informing his master
     of his progress.

     On his next walk with Qc Na, Anton attempted to impress his master
     by saying "Master, I have diligently studied the matter, and now
     understand that objects are truly a poor man's closures." Qc Na
     responded by hitting Anton with his stick, saying "When will you
     learn? Closures are a poor man's object." At that moment, Anton
     became enlightened.

If objects are a poor man's closure, they certainly can be a poor man's 
function as well.  In Ruby, we use objects as functions.  Any object 
that responds to the call message can be used, but by far the most 
common functional object is the Ruby Proc/Lambda object.

Here's the curry operation mentioned above, but done with first class 
function objects in Ruby.

    f = lambda { |x, y| x + y }
    curry = lambda { |f, n|   lambda { |x| f.call(n, x) } }
    g = curry.call(f, 2)
    g.call(3)   #=> 5

In summary:

o "def" defines a method, not a function, first class or otherwise.
o What looks like a function call is really a message send to an object.
o Ruby uses objects for its functional programming.  Since the function
   is an object, calling it involves a normal object-style message using
   "call" as the message selector.

I'll close with this thought.  Ruby and Python are perfect examples of a 
duality between functions and objects.  Where Ruby begins with objects 
and builds functions out of them, Python begins with functions and 
builds objects out of them.  And what is really surprising is that 
despite the rather fundamental differences in their semantic foundation, 
the languages are more alike than they are different!

-- 
-- Jim Weirich    jim@weirichhouse.org     http://onestepback.org
-----------------------------------------------------------------
"Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct,
not tried it." -- Donald Knuth (in a memo to Peter van Emde Boas)

[1] I'm not trying to imply that all method invocations involve the
     reification of a message.  In fact, I have little knowledge of what
     goes on under the covers in the C implementation.  I'm only saying
     that obj.method is semantically equivalent to obj.send(:method).


In This Thread