[#69892] [Ruby trunk - Feature #11339] [Open] [PATCH] io.c: avoid kwarg parsing in C API — normalperson@...
Issue #11339 has been reported by Eric Wong.
8 messages
2015/07/07
[#69983] Re: [Ruby trunk - Feature #11339] [Open] [PATCH] io.c: avoid kwarg parsing in C API
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2015/07/15
normalperson@yhbt.net wrote:
[#69990] Re: [Ruby trunk - Feature #11339] [Open] [PATCH] io.c: avoid kwarg parsing in C API
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2015/07/16
On 2015/07/16 4:41, Eric Wong wrote:
[#69995] Re: [Ruby trunk - Feature #11339] [Open] [PATCH] io.c: avoid kwarg parsing in C API
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2015/07/16
SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
[#69984] $SAFE inside an Array — Bertram Scharpf <lists@...>
Hi,
4 messages
2015/07/15
[#70001] [Ruby trunk - Bug #11336] [Open] TestProcess#test_exec_fd_3_redirect failed on Solaris 10 — ngotogenome@...
Issue #11336 has been updated by Naohisa Goto.
4 messages
2015/07/16
[#70005] Re: [Ruby trunk - Bug #11336] [Open] TestProcess#test_exec_fd_3_redirect failed on Solaris 10
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2015/07/16
Sorry, but I think rb_divert_reserved_fd seems a racy fix. I think the
[#70011] [Ruby trunk - Bug #11362] [Open] [PATCH] ensure Process.kill(:STOP, $$) is resumable — normalperson@...
Issue #11362 has been reported by Eric Wong.
3 messages
2015/07/17
[#70016] [Ruby trunk - Bug #11364] [Open] Use smaller buffer for sendmsg — merch-redmine@...
Issue #11364 has been reported by Jeremy Evans.
8 messages
2015/07/17
[#70052] Re: [Ruby trunk - Bug #11364] [Open] Use smaller buffer for sendmsg
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2015/07/20
merch-redmine@jeremyevans.net wrote:
[#70055] Re: [Ruby trunk - Bug #11364] [Open] Use smaller buffer for sendmsg
— Jeremy Evans <code@...>
2015/07/20
On 07/20 10:46, Eric Wong wrote:
[#70056] Re: [Ruby trunk - Bug #11364] [Open] Use smaller buffer for sendmsg
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2015/07/21
Jeremy Evans <code@jeremyevans.net> wrote:
[#70103] [Ruby trunk - Feature #11375] Decreased Object Allocation in Pathname.rb — richard.schneeman@...
Issue #11375 has been updated by Richard Schneeman.
3 messages
2015/07/23
[#70156] [Ruby trunk - Bug #11396] Bad performance in ruby >= 2.2 for Hash with many symbol keys — dunric29a@...
Issue #11396 has been updated by David Unric.
3 messages
2015/07/28
[ruby-core:70171] [Ruby trunk - Bug #9381] 2.1.0 Regression. Hash lookup with #hash and #eql?
From:
nagachika00@...
Date:
2015-07-29 10:39:42 UTC
List:
ruby-core #70171
Issue #9381 has been updated by Tomoyuki Chikanaga.
Backport changed from 1.9.3: DONTNEED, 2.0.0: DONTNEED, 2.1: DONE to 1.9.3: DONTNEED, 2.0.0: DONTNEED, 2.1: REQUIRED, 2.2: REQUIRED
I re-fill Backport field for r51425. I'm not sure if this is bugfix or feature change though.
----------------------------------------
Bug #9381: 2.1.0 Regression. Hash lookup with #hash and #eql?
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/9381#change-53599
* Author: Nick S
* Status: Closed
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee: Nobuyoshi Nakada
* ruby -v: ruby 2.1.0p0 (2013-12-25 revision 44422) [x86_64-linux]
* Backport: 1.9.3: DONTNEED, 2.0.0: DONTNEED, 2.1: REQUIRED, 2.2: REQUIRED
----------------------------------------
Ruby 2.1.0 won't fetch objects when the lookup key overrides `#hash` and `#eql?`.
This is a regression as it works as expected in ruby 1.8, 1.9 and 2.0.
```ruby
class Wrapper
def initialize(obj)
@obj = obj
end
def method_missing(symbol, *args, &block)
@obj.__send__(symbol, *args, &block)
end
def hash
@obj.hash
end
def eql?(other)
@obj.eql?(other)
end
end
hash = { 5 => "LOOKUP SUCCEEDED" }
# Prints "LOOKUP SUCCEEDED" on RUBY < 2.1.0. Fails on RUBY 2.1.0.
p hash[Wrapper.new(5)]
```
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/