ruby-core

Issue #6284 has been updated by Paul Mucur.


Regarding the syntax: I also support `*` as the operator where `f * g = f(g(x))` (as it seems close enough to the mathematical syntax already used by other languages such as Haskell and Idris) but if that is too divisive, we could choose a method name from the mathematical definition (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Function_composition) instead:

> The notation g ∘ f is read as "g circle f ", or "g round f ", or "g composed with f ", "g after f ", "g following f ", or "g of f", or "g on f ".

This opens up the following options:

* `Proc#compose`: `f.compose(g) #=> f(g(x))`
* `Proc#after`: `f.after(g) #=> f(g(x))`
* `Proc#following`: `f.following(g) #=> f(g(x))`
* `Proc#of`: `f.of(g) #=> f(g(x))`
* `Proc#on`: `f.on(g) #=> f(g(x))`

----------------------------------------
Feature #6284: Add composition for procs
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/6284#change-53146

* Author: Pablo Herrero
* Status: Feedback
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee: Yukihiro Matsumoto
----------------------------------------
=begin
It would be nice to be able to compose procs like functions in functional programming languages:

    to_camel = :capitalize.to_proc
    add_header = ->val {"Title: " + val}

    format_as_title = add_header << to_camel << :strip

instead of:

    format_as_title = lambda {|val| "Title: " + val.strip.capitalize }


It's pretty easy to implement in pure ruby:

  class Proc
    def << block
      proc { |*args| self.call( block.to_proc.call(*args) ) }
    end
  end
=end

---Files--------------------------------
0002-proc.c-Implement-Method-for-Method-composition.patch (2.71 KB)
0001-proc.c-Implement-Proc-for-Proc-composition.patch (3.73 KB)
0003-proc.c-Support-any-callable-when-composing-Procs.patch (4.01 KB)


-- 
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/