[#61822] Plan Developers Meeting Japan April 2014 — Zachary Scott <e@...>
I would like to request developers meeting around April 17 or 18 in this month.
14 messages
2014/04/03
[#61825] Re: Plan Developers Meeting Japan April 2014
— Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...>
2014/04/03
It's good if we have a meeting then.
[#61826] Re: Plan Developers Meeting Japan April 2014
— Zachary Scott <e@...>
2014/04/03
Regarding openssl issues, I’ve discussed possible meeting time with Martin last month and he seemed positive.
[#61833] Re: Plan Developers Meeting Japan April 2014
— Martin Bo煬et <martin.bosslet@...>
2014/04/03
Hi,
[#61847] Re: Plan Developers Meeting Japan April 2014
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2014/04/03
Martin Boテ殕et <martin.bosslet@gmail.com> wrote:
[#61849] Re: Plan Developers Meeting Japan April 2014
— Zachary Scott <e@...>
2014/04/04
I will post summary of meeting on Google docs after the meeting.
[#61852] Re: Plan Developers Meeting Japan April 2014
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2014/04/04
Zachary Scott <e@zzak.io> wrote:
[#61860] Re: Plan Developers Meeting Japan April 2014
— Zachary Scott <e@...>
2014/04/04
I’m ok with redmine, thanks for bringing up your concern!
[#62076] Candidacy to 2.1 branch maintainer. — Tomoyuki Chikanaga <nagachika00@...>
Hello,
7 messages
2014/04/17
[#62078] Re: Candidacy to 2.1 branch maintainer.
— SHIBATA Hiroshi <shibata.hiroshi@...>
2014/04/17
> And does anyone have counter proposal for 2.1 maintenance?
[ruby-core:61798] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9321] rb_mod_const_missing does not generate a c-return event
From:
deivid.rodriguez@...
Date:
2014-04-01 11:45:50 UTC
List:
ruby-core #61798
Issue #9321 has been updated by David Rodr鱈guez. As far as I'm concerned, this changes an (incorrect) behaviour and it should be backported. In byebug's case, having a balanced count of call and return events is critical and directly affects usability of the debugger. And when I thought of implementing a workaround inside byebug's didn't seem like an easy thing to do... Stefan Kaes, did you implement a workaround for this in ruby-prof? Cheers! ---------------------------------------- Bug #9321: rb_mod_const_missing does not generate a c-return event https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/9321#change-46033 * Author: Stefan Kaes * Status: Closed * Priority: Normal * Assignee: * Category: core * Target version: * ruby -v: ruby 2.1.0p1 (2013-12-26 revision 44431) [x86_64-darwin12.0] * Backport: 2.0.0: REQUIRED, 2.1: REQUIRED ---------------------------------------- We have had an issue reported for ruby-prof where execution times were attributed incorrectly in the call graph. It turned out that the problem is caused by a missing c-return event for Module#const_missing. ruby-prof simulates the ruby call stack by subscribing to line, call, c-call, return and c-return events. Obviously, the missing return throws ruby-prof off the track. ---Files-------------------------------- rb_mod_const_missing.patch (643 Bytes) rb_mod_const_missing_with_tests.patch (1.48 KB) rb_mod_const_missing_with_tests_redefined.patch (3.01 KB) -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/