[#58120] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9070][Open] Introduce `---` as synonym of `end` keyword — "alexeymuranov (Alexey Muranov)" <redmine@...>
5 messages
2013/11/01
[#58149] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9076][Open] New one-argument block syntax: &. — "asterite (Ary Borenszweig)" <ary@...>
23 messages
2013/11/04
[#58259] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9099][Open] Train emoji lambda operator — "charliesome (Charlie Somerville)" <charliesome@...>
9 messages
2013/11/10
[#58312] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9107][Open] Introduce YES and NO as aliases of true and false — "gsamokovarov (Genadi Samokovarov)" <gsamokovarov@...>
5 messages
2013/11/13
[#58350] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9113][Open] Ship Ruby for Linux with jemalloc out-of-the-box — "sam.saffron (Sam Saffron)" <sam.saffron@...>
59 messages
2013/11/15
[#60851] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #9113][Open] Ship Ruby for Linux with jemalloc out-of-the-box
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2014/02/19
Btw, I also hope to experiment with a slab allocator since many internal
[#62721] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9113] Ship Ruby for Linux with jemalloc out-of-the-box
— nobu@...
2014/05/24
Issue #9113 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.
[#62735] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9113] Ship Ruby for Linux with jemalloc out-of-the-box
— normalperson@...
2014/05/25
Issue #9113 has been updated by Eric Wong.
[#58391] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9119][Assigned] TestTime#test_marshal_broken_offset broken under MinGW — "luislavena (Luis Lavena)" <luislavena@...>
10 messages
2013/11/17
[#58396] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9121][Open] [PATCH] Remove rbtree implementation of SortedSet due to performance regression — "xshay (Xavier Shay)" <contact@...>
15 messages
2013/11/18
[#58404] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9123][Open] Make Numeric#nonzero? behavior consistent with Numeric#zero? — "sferik (Erik Michaels-Ober)" <sferik@...>
40 messages
2013/11/18
[#58411] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9124][Open] TestSocket errors in test-all on Arch 64-bit — "jonforums (Jon Forums)" <redmine@...>
14 messages
2013/11/18
[#58515] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9124] TestSocket errors in test-all on Arch 64-bit
— "jonforums (Jon Forums)" <redmine@...>
2013/11/23
[#58841] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9124] TestSocket errors in test-all on Arch 64-bit
— "jonforums (Jon Forums)" <redmine@...>
2013/12/04
[#58842] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #9124] TestSocket errors in test-all on Arch 64-bit
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2013/12/04
"jonforums (Jon Forums)" <redmine@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#58452] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9133][Open] logger rotates log files more than expected — "no6v (Nobuhiro IMAI)" <nov@...>
8 messages
2013/11/21
[#58473] Object identity for string hash keys — Andrew Vit <andrew@...>
I'm not sure if this is a bug. I'm creating a hash like this:
5 messages
2013/11/21
[#58490] Re: [ruby-cvs:50910] drbrain:r43767 (trunk): * lib/rubygems: Update to RubyGems master 50a8210. Important changes — Tanaka Akira <akr@...>
2013/11/22 <drbrain@ruby-lang.org>:
4 messages
2013/11/22
[#58492] Re: [ruby-cvs:50910] drbrain:r43767 (trunk): * lib/rubygems: Update to RubyGems master 50a8210. Important changes
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2013/11/22
Tanaka Akira <akr@fsij.org> wrote:
[#58496] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9140][Open] Allow each_with_index to get start index — "rosenfeld (Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas)" <rr.rosas@...>
8 messages
2013/11/22
[#58545] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9145][Open] Queue#pop(true) return nil if empty instead of raising ThreadError — "jsc (Justin Collins)" <redmine@...>
9 messages
2013/11/24
[#58599] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9159][Open] [patch] use rb_fstring for internal strings — "tmm1 (Aman Gupta)" <ruby@...1.net>
5 messages
2013/11/26
[#58653] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9170][Open] Math.sqrt returns different types when mathn is included; breaks various gems - this bug can be reproduced in Ruby 1.8 as well — "kranzky (Jason Hutchens)" <JasonHutchens@...>
7 messages
2013/11/28
[#58719] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5446] at_fork callback API — "tmm1 (Aman Gupta)" <ruby@...1.net>
6 messages
2013/11/30
[ruby-core:58713] Re: [ruby-trunk - misc #8962][Assigned] [DOC] add step to enable Generational GC merits in README.EXT*
From:
Tadashi Saito <tad.a.digger@...>
Date:
2013-11-30 15:43:09 UTC
List:
ruby-core #58713
ping?
2013/10/16 zzak (Zachary Scott) <e@zzak.io>
>
> Issue #8962 has been updated by zzak (Zachary Scott).
>
> Status changed from Open to Assigned
>
> Koichi, could you add some notes on this, maybe link to helpful RGenGC
> documentation.
>
> I will bug you again at RubyConf :)
> ----------------------------------------
> misc #8962: [DOC] add step to enable Generational GC merits in README.EXT*
> https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/8962#change-42473
>
> Author: tad (Tadashi Saito)
> Status: Assigned
> Priority: Normal
> Assignee: zzak (Zachary Scott)
> Category: doc
> Target version: current: 2.1.0
>
>
> =begin
>
> Is there any chance to reap the benefit of new Generational GC merits for
> C-extension library authors?
>
> == Background
>
> First of all: RGenGC is great. Ko1 showed that it could make significant
> performance improvement at RubyKaigi2013. (especially P82)
> ((<RubyKaigi2013-ko1.pdf|URL:
> http://www.atdot.net/~ko1/activities/RubyKaigi2013-ko1.pdf>))
>
> I guess the improvement is triggered by marking most (or all?) of built-in
> classes as WB-protected struct to work with Generational GC.
>
> == Motivation
>
> As an extension library author, I want to try to get the performance merit.
> But there is no document or guide to enable it.
>
> The PDF says "Inserting WBs step by step, and increase performance
> gradually",
> and I believe it is the greatest point of RGenGC, but there is no guide to
> proceed with the steps for now. It's sad.
>
> == Subject
>
> Could you write about it as a document, ko1 or anyone?
> I guess it's good to be written at ((%README.EXT*%)).
> (The case of ((%iseq.c%)) may be used as an example.)
>
> I'm glad to see the documents are written before Ruby 2.1 release.
>
> == Restriction
>
> Sorry for the absence of my knowledge. Because I'm not good at
> RGenGC, I could't write the document by myself but could only request.
>
> PS
> I guess this issue depends on #3064 (sorry, in Japanse), the request of
> documenting (({RTypedData})), because there is no interface to specify
> (({FL_WB_PROTECTED})) flag with traditional (({RData})).
>
> =end
>
>
>
> --
> http://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
>
--
Tadashi Saito