[#55794] how to run ruby tests (backporting fix for cve-2013-4073) — Jordi Massaguer Pla <jmassaguerpla@...>
Hi ruby core developers,
4 messages
2013/07/04
[#55799] Re: how to run ruby tests (backporting fix for cve-2013-4073)
— V咜 Ondruch <v.ondruch@...>
2013/07/04
Dne 4.7.2013 13:19, Jordi Massaguer Pla napsal(a):
[#55853] ruby 1.9.3 p448 breaks ABI — V咜 Ondruch <v.ondruch@...>
Hi,
13 messages
2013/07/08
[#55854] Re: ruby 1.9.3 p448 breaks ABI
— Yorick Peterse <yorickpeterse@...>
2013/07/08
Out of curiosity, does this tool take into account deprecated/internal
[#55860] Re: ruby 1.9.3 p448 breaks ABI
— V咜 Ondruch <v.ondruch@...>
2013/07/08
Dne 8.7.2013 17:03, Yorick Peterse napsal(a):
[#55861] Re: ruby 1.9.3 p448 breaks ABI
— KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...>
2013/07/08
(7/8/13 5:36 PM), V咜 Ondruch wrote:
[#55864] Re: ruby 1.9.3 p448 breaks ABI
— Jon <jon.forums@...>
2013/07/08
On Tue, 9 Jul 2013 06:50:16 +0900
[#55886] [ruby-trunk - Bug #8616][Open] Process.daemon messes up threads — "tenderlovemaking (Aaron Patterson)" <aaron@...>
10 messages
2013/07/09
[#55976] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8629][Open] Method#parameters should include the default value — "rosenfeld (Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas)" <rr.rosas@...>
13 messages
2013/07/12
[#56258] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8629] Method#parameters should include the default value
— "rosenfeld (Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas)" <rr.rosas@...>
2013/07/29
[#55984] [ruby-trunk - Bug #8630][Open] Transcoding high-bit bytes from ASCII-8BIT to a text encoding should be :invalid, not :undef — "headius (Charles Nutter)" <headius@...>
5 messages
2013/07/12
[#55986] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #8630][Open] Transcoding high-bit bytes from ASCII-8BIT to a text encoding should be :invalid, not :undef
— Tanaka Akira <akr@...>
2013/07/12
2013/7/13 headius (Charles Nutter) <headius@headius.com>:
[#55988] Next developer's meeting — Aaron Patterson <tenderlove@...>
Hi,
4 messages
2013/07/13
[#56001] [CommonRuby - Feature #8635][Open] attr_accessor with default block — "judofyr (Magnus Holm)" <judofyr@...>
5 messages
2013/07/14
[#56004] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8636][Open] Documentation hosting on ruby-lang.org — "zzak (Zachary Scott)" <e@...>
18 messages
2013/07/15
[#56005] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8637][Open] I18n documentation — "zzak (Zachary Scott)" <e@...>
5 messages
2013/07/15
[#56010] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8637] I18n documentation
— "zzak (Zachary Scott)" <e@...>
2013/07/15
[#56011] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8637] I18n documentation
— "kou (Kouhei Sutou)" <kou@...>
2013/07/15
[#56019] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8639][Open] Add Queue#each — "avdi (Avdi Grimm)" <avdi@...>
15 messages
2013/07/15
[#56020] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8639] Add Queue#each
— "rkh (Konstantin Haase)" <me@...>
2013/07/15
[#56029] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #8639][Open] Add Queue#each
— Alex Young <alex@...>
2013/07/15
On Tue, 2013-07-16 at 00:44 +0900, avdi (Avdi Grimm) wrote:
[#56027] [CommonRuby - Feature #8640][Open] Add Time#elapsed to return nanoseconds since creation — "tenderlovemaking (Aaron Patterson)" <aaron@...>
24 messages
2013/07/15
[#56068] [CommonRuby - Feature #8640] Add Time#elapsed to return nanoseconds since creation
— "phluid61 (Matthew Kerwin)" <matthew@...>
2013/07/17
[#56070] Re: [CommonRuby - Feature #8640] Add Time#elapsed to return nanoseconds since creation
— Aaron Patterson <tenderlove@...>
2013/07/18
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 07:59:34AM +0900, phluid61 (Matthew Kerwin) wrote:
[#56037] [CommonRuby - Feature #8640] Add Time#elapsed to return nanoseconds since creation
— duerst (Martin Dürst) <duerst@...>
2013/07/16
[#56041] [CommonRuby - Feature #8643][Open] Add Binding.from_hash — "rosenfeld (Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas)" <rr.rosas@...>
26 messages
2013/07/16
[#56087] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8658][Open] Process.clock_gettime — "akr (Akira Tanaka)" <akr@...>
23 messages
2013/07/19
[#56092] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8658] Process.clock_gettime
— "akr (Akira Tanaka)" <akr@...>
2013/07/20
[#56132] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #8658] Process.clock_gettime
— KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...>
2013/07/23
(7/20/13 6:39 AM), akr (Akira Tanaka) wrote:
[#56135] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #8658] Process.clock_gettime
— Tanaka Akira <akr@...>
2013/07/24
2013/7/24 KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com>:
[#56096] [CommonRuby - Feature #8661][Open] Add option to print backstrace in reverse order(stack frames first & error last) — "gary4gar (Gaurish Sharma)" <gary4gar@...>
18 messages
2013/07/20
[#56103] Ruby Developer Meeting Japan 2013-07-27 — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...>
Hi,
6 messages
2013/07/21
[#56228] [ruby-trunk - Bug #8697][Open] Fixnum complement operator issue — "torimus (Torimus GL)" <torimus.gl@...>
8 messages
2013/07/27
[#56247] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8700][Open] Integer#bitsize (actually Fixnum#bitsize and Bignum#bitsize) — "akr (Akira Tanaka)" <akr@...>
8 messages
2013/07/28
[#56270] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8707][Open] Hash#reverse_each — "Glass_saga (Masaki Matsushita)" <glass.saga@...>
8 messages
2013/07/30
[#56276] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8707][Feedback] Hash#reverse_each
— "matz (Yukihiro Matsumoto)" <matz@...>
2013/07/31
[ruby-core:55782] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8229] extend Hash.include?
From:
"fuadksd (Fuad Saud)" <fuadksd@...>
Date:
2013-07-03 16:10:42 UTC
List:
ruby-core #55782
Issue #8229 has been updated by fuadksd (Fuad Saud).
I think this would be more interesting if in the form:
h = { a: 'b', c: { d: 'e' } }
h.include({c: { d: 'e' } }) # => true
It wpuld accept a hash and check whether h includes that hash.
----------------------------------------
Feature #8229: extend Hash.include?
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/8229#change-40277
Author: eike.rb (Eike Dierks)
Status: Open
Priority: Normal
Assignee: matz (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
Category: core
Target version: Next Major
I'd like to suggest to extend the Hash.include? method.
Currently Hash.include? can only be used to ask for a key,
I believe it should be extended to ask for a (key value) pair.
I believe this extension can be done without breaking prior api.
I suggest to extend the signature of Hash.include?
to Hash.include?(key, value)
That message should return true,
if the receiving object does have an object at key which is equal to value.
It would be a simple replacement for:
h.include?(key) && h[key] == value
But I do not want to stop there.
I'm heading for h.include_all?(other_hash)
and h.include_any?(other_hash)
and it would be valuable to have h.intersect(other_hash) etc
I believe these to be useful primitives when working with hashes.
I'd like to have the api of the Set class available for the Hash class as well,
but there working on key/value matching.
Obviously any change to such the substantial class as the Hash class
needs a lot of thought for compatibility.
But I believe this can be done without breaking any prior code,
and it could add a lot of new out of the box functionality.
This probably needs some more thought.
We might come up with some dsl like thing like
h.includes.any? or h.includes.all? or h.includes.none?
to be used cross all collection classes.
Someone must be in charge for the Hash class,
my 2p
--
http://bugs.ruby-lang.org/