[#43077] problems committing — Aaron Patterson <tenderlove@...>
It seems like the disk might be full on the svn server:
5 messages
2012/03/05
[#43090] "\\".gsub("\\", "\\\\") == "\\" ?!!! — Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...>
Please, help me understand what is happening here.
6 messages
2012/03/06
[#43094] Re: "\\".gsub("\\", "\\\\") == "\\" ?!!!
— Xavier Noria <fxn@...>
2012/03/06
A literal passed as second argument to gsub goes over two
[#43120] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6124][Open] What is the purpose of "fake" gems in Ruby — Vit Ondruch <v.ondruch@...>
27 messages
2012/03/07
[#43142] Questions about thread performance (with benchmark included) — Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...>
A while ago I've written an article entitled "How Nokogiri and JRuby
10 messages
2012/03/08
[#43785] Re: Questions about thread performance (with benchmark included)
— Tomoyuki Chikanaga <nagachika00@...>
2012/03/28
Hello, Rodrigo.
[#43797] Re: Questions about thread performance (with benchmark included)
— Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...>
2012/03/28
Em 27-03-2012 23:22, Tomoyuki Chikanaga escreveu:
[#44213] Re: Questions about thread performance (with benchmark included)
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2012/04/09
Hi,
[#44214] Re: Questions about thread performance (with benchmark included)
— Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...>
2012/04/09
#### MRI threads myths and facts #####
[#44220] Re: Questions about thread performance (with benchmark included)
— Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...>
2012/04/09
Hi Urabe, thank you for your input, but I think you have
[#43245] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6131][Open] Ctrl-C handler do not work from exec process (Windows) — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>
10 messages
2012/03/12
[#43279] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6148][Open] ruby_1_9_3 revision conflict — Jon Forums <redmine@...>
4 messages
2012/03/14
[#43313] [ruby-trunk - Feature #6150][Open] add Enumerable#grep_v — Suraj Kurapati <sunaku@...>
17 messages
2012/03/15
[#43325] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6154][Open] Eliminate extending WaitReadable/Writable at runtime — Charles Nutter <headius@...>
25 messages
2012/03/16
[#43326] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6154] Eliminate extending WaitReadable/Writable at runtime
— Charles Nutter <headius@...>
2012/03/16
[#43369] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #6154][Open] Eliminate extending WaitReadable/Writable at runtime
— Tanaka Akira <akr@...>
2012/03/17
2012/3/16 Charles Nutter <headius@headius.com>:
[#43334] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6155][Open] Enumerable::Lazy#flat_map raises an exception when an element does not respond to #each — Dan Kubb <dan.kubb@...>
9 messages
2012/03/16
[#43345] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6159][Open] Enumerable::Lazy#inspect — Benoit Daloze <redmine@...>
10 messages
2012/03/16
[#43497] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6179][Open] File::pos broken in Windows 1.9.3p125 — "jmthomas (Jason Thomas)" <jmthomas@...>
24 messages
2012/03/20
[#43502] [ruby-trunk - Feature #6180][Open] to_b for converting objects to a boolean value — "AaronLasseigne (Aaron Lasseigne)" <aaron.lasseigne@...>
17 messages
2012/03/20
[#43529] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6183][Open] Enumerator::Lazy performance issue — "gregolsen (Innokenty Mikhailov)" <anotheroneman@...>
36 messages
2012/03/21
[#43814] [ruby-trunk - Feature #6219][Open] Return value of Hash#store — "MartinBosslet (Martin Bosslet)" <Martin.Bosslet@...>
20 messages
2012/03/28
[#43904] [ruby-trunk - Feature #6225][Open] Hash#+ — "trans (Thomas Sawyer)" <transfire@...>
36 messages
2012/03/29
[#43909] [ruby-trunk - Feature #6225][Assigned] Hash#+
— "mame (Yusuke Endoh)" <mame@...>
2012/03/29
[#43923] [ruby-trunk - Feature #6225] Hash#+
— "shyouhei (Shyouhei Urabe)" <shyouhei@...>
2012/03/30
[#43951] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6228][Open] [mingw] Errno::EBADF in ruby/test_io.rb on ruby_1_9_3 — "jonforums (Jon Forums)" <redmine@...>
28 messages
2012/03/30
[#43996] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6236][Open] WEBrick::HTTPServer swallows Exception — "regularfry (Alex Young)" <alex@...>
13 messages
2012/03/31
[#44015] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #6239][Open] super Does Not Pass Modified Rest Args When Originally Empty — "mudge (Paul Mucur)" <mudge@...>
6 messages
2012/03/31
[ruby-core:43976] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5677][Assigned] IO C API
From:
"nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada)" <nobu@...>
Date:
2012-03-31 01:53:18 UTC
List:
ruby-core #43976
Issue #5677 has been updated by nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada). Status changed from Open to Assigned Assignee set to akr (Akira Tanaka) MartinBosslet (Martin Bosslet) wrote: > 1. Duplicating the file descriptor to obtain a pure FILE* > like it is done in ext/openssl/ossl_bio.c[2] and continue > working on the raw FILE*. Can't you use rb_io_stdio_file()? And OpenSSL seems providing BIO_new_fd() too. > The problem, though, is that only rb_io_bufwrite is public API in io.h, > rb_io_bufread is declared private in internal.h and rb_cloexec_dup is > semi-public in intern.h. > > Could we make rb_io_bufread public API in io.h as well? What about > rb_cloexec_dup? It doesn't seem bad to me. They are all added to internal.h by akr. ---------------------------------------- Feature #5677: IO C API https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/5677#change-25497 Author: MartinBosslet (Martin Bosslet) Status: Assigned Priority: Normal Assignee: akr (Akira Tanaka) Category: core Target version: 2.0.0 This is related to the proposal in [ruby-core:41321][1]. I'd like to take advantage of streaming IO in an extension I am working on. The problem I'm having is that I don't want to call IO#read on the rb_funcall level because that would kill the performance due to wrapping the bytes into Ruby objects back and forth again. I saw two solutions to my problem: 1. Duplicating the file descriptor to obtain a pure FILE* like it is done in ext/openssl/ossl_bio.c[2] and continue working on the raw FILE*. 2. Since I really only need to read and write on the stream, I was looking for public Ruby C API that would support me in the process, and I found - ssize_t rb_io_bufwrite(VALUE io, const void *buf, size_t size) - ssize_t rb_io_bufread(VALUE io, void *buf, size_t size) I think both cases are valid use cases, 1. is likely necessary if there is the need to pass a FILE* on to an external C library, 2. is for cases like mine where there is the need to operate on raw C data types for performance reasons. The problem, though, is that only rb_io_bufwrite is public API in io.h, rb_io_bufread is declared private in internal.h and rb_cloexec_dup is semi-public in intern.h. Could we make rb_io_bufread public API in io.h as well? What about rb_cloexec_dup? [1] http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ruby/ruby-core/41321 [2] https://github.com/ruby/ruby/blob/trunk/ext/openssl/ossl_bio.c#L17 -- http://bugs.ruby-lang.org/