[#102687] [Ruby master Bug#17666] Sleep in a thread hangs when Fiber.set_scheduler is set — arjundas.27586@...

Issue #17666 has been reported by arjunmdas (arjun das).

16 messages 2021/03/02

[#102776] [Ruby master Bug#17678] Ractors do not restart after fork — knuckles@...

Issue #17678 has been reported by ivoanjo (Ivo Anjo).

8 messages 2021/03/08

[#102797] [Ruby master Feature#17684] Remove `--disable-gems` from release version of Ruby — hsbt@...

Issue #17684 has been reported by hsbt (Hiroshi SHIBATA).

17 messages 2021/03/10

[#102829] [Ruby master Bug#17718] a method paramaters object that can be pattern matched against — dsisnero@...

Issue #17718 has been reported by dsisnero (Dominic Sisneros).

9 messages 2021/03/11

[#102832] [Ruby master Misc#17720] Cirrus CI to check non-x86_64 architecture cases by own machines — jaruga@...

Issue #17720 has been reported by jaruga (Jun Aruga).

19 messages 2021/03/12

[#102850] [Ruby master Bug#17723] autoconf 2.70+ is not working with master branch — hsbt@...

Issue #17723 has been reported by hsbt (Hiroshi SHIBATA).

11 messages 2021/03/14

[#102884] [Ruby master Bug#17725] Prepend Breaks Ability to Alias — josh@...

Issue #17725 has been reported by joshuadreed (Josh Reed).

14 messages 2021/03/16

[#102914] [Ruby master Bug#17728] [BUG] Segmentation fault at 0x0000000000000000 — denthebat@...

Issue #17728 has been reported by meliborn (Denis Denis).

13 messages 2021/03/18

[#102919] [Ruby master Bug#17730] Ruby on macOS transitively links to ~150 dylibs — rickmark@...

Issue #17730 has been reported by rickmark (Rick Mark).

10 messages 2021/03/18

[#103013] [Ruby master Bug#17748] Ruby 3.0 takes a long time to resolv DNS of nonexistent domains — xdmx@...

Issue #17748 has been reported by xdmx (Eric Bloom).

8 messages 2021/03/25

[#103026] [Ruby master Feature#17749] Const source location without name — tenderlove@...

Issue #17749 has been reported by tenderlovemaking (Aaron Patterson).

10 messages 2021/03/25

[#103036] [Ruby master Misc#17751] Do these instructions (<<, +, [0..n]) modify the original string without creating copies? — cart4for1@...

Issue #17751 has been reported by stiuna (Juan Gregorio).

11 messages 2021/03/26

[#103040] [Ruby master Feature#17752] Enable -Wundef for C extensions in repository — eregontp@...

Issue #17752 has been reported by Eregon (Benoit Daloze).

23 messages 2021/03/26

[#103044] [Ruby master Feature#17753] Add Module#outer_scope — tenderlove@...

Issue #17753 has been reported by tenderlovemaking (Aaron Patterson).

31 messages 2021/03/26

[#103088] [Ruby master Feature#17760] Where we should install a header file when `gem install --user`? — muraken@...

Issue #17760 has been reported by mrkn (Kenta Murata).

11 messages 2021/03/30

[#103102] [Ruby master Feature#17762] A simple way to trace object allocation — mame@...

Issue #17762 has been reported by mame (Yusuke Endoh).

18 messages 2021/03/30

[#103105] [Ruby master Feature#17763] Implement cache for cvars — eileencodes@...

Issue #17763 has been reported by eileencodes (Eileen Uchitelle).

18 messages 2021/03/30

[ruby-core:102759] [Ruby master Bug#17354] Module#const_source_location is misleading for constants awaiting autoload

From: sawadatsuyoshi@...
Date: 2021-03-06 02:50:14 UTC
List: ruby-core #102759
Issue #17354 has been updated by sawa (Tsuyoshi Sawada).


When I proposed this feature in #10771, the motivation was to create a tool that automatically reads ruby code and documents its methods and constants together with their source code. To extract the relevant source code, knowing the start and end points of the definitions is necessary. The current feature gives the file name and the line number of the start point of the definition, lacking the character position (as well as information regarding the endpoint of the definition), which is only a part of what as necessary for me, but I still appreciate the developers for implementing the feature.

I agree with Tom that the current behaviour is wrong, and returning the calling site does not make sense, nor is it useful. But I don't think `[]` should be returned, for the reason Aaron discusses. I think `nil` should be returned. And I think that the behaviour should be in line with that of `const_defined?`.

I am not a big fan of Aaron's proposal (to attempt) to load the constant on the spot, but that would be my second preference. It is at least better than the current behaviour.

----------------------------------------
Bug #17354: Module#const_source_location is misleading for constants awaiting autoload
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/17354#change-90772

* Author: tomstuart (Tom Stuart)
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
* ruby -v: ruby 2.7.2p137 (2020-10-01 revision 5445e04352) [x86_64-darwin20]
* Backport: 2.5: UNKNOWN, 2.6: UNKNOWN, 2.7: UNKNOWN
----------------------------------------
Feature #10771 added `Module#const_source_location` as a way to find the source location of a constant’s definition. Bug #16764 reported that it didn’t work correctly for autoloaded constants, instead giving the source location of the `autoload` call site. This was fixed in `v3_0_0_preview1` in commit:92730810 and backported to `v2_7_2` in commit:c65aae11.

However, `#const_source_location` still returns the `autoload` call site for constants which have not yet been loaded:

```
% echo 'class Foo; end' > foo.rb

% irb
>> Module.const_defined?(:Foo)
=> false
>> Module.const_source_location(:Foo)
=> nil

>> autoload :Foo, './foo'
=> nil

>> Module.const_defined?(:Foo)
=> true
>> Module.const_source_location(:Foo)
=> ["(irb)", 3]

>> Module.const_get(:Foo)
=> Foo

>> Module.const_defined?(:Foo)
=> true
>> Module.const_source_location(:Foo)
=> ["./foo.rb", 1]
```

This edge case is undocumented and surprising. It looks like a bug to the programmer who receives the `autoload` location instead of one of the documented return values of `#const_source_location` (`nil`, `[]`, or the definition’s source location).

We could either:

* change the behaviour of `#const_source_location` to return `[]` for constants awaiting autoload, which is consistent with the [return value of `Module#const_defined?`](https://docs.ruby-lang.org/en/2.7.0/Module.html#method-i-const_defined-3F) in this case (“if the constant is not present but there is an autoload for it, `true` is returned directly”), as well as the [return value of `#const_source_location`](https://docs.ruby-lang.org/en/2.7.0/Module.html#method-i-const_source_location) for other constants whose source location is unknown (“if the constant is found, but its source location can not be extracted (constant is defined in C code), empty array is returned”); or
* document the current behaviour of `#const_source_location` to make it less surprising.

I recommend the first option — although the current behaviour was recently specified in source:spec/ruby/core/module/const_source_location_spec.rb@6d059674#L209, it doesn’t seem intentional — but if that’s not feasible, simply documenting this edge case would also be an improvement.



-- 
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>

In This Thread